The Consequences Of Being An Ideologue – Feminists
In this Part of our not-ongoing series, we look at those Ideologues who describe themselves as Feminists.
For an expert opinion, we turn to Dr. Robert Stacy McCain, Director of Research at The McCain Institute For Advanced Vaginology, author of Know Your Vajayjay: An Expert Guide to What’s Up Down There and, his latest, Now Get Me A Sammich: Why The Heteronormative Patriarchy Is Good For You Ladies:
…Feminism provides an ideological interpretation of women’s unhappiness which — just coincidentally — tells them that they are never responsible for anything that goes wrong in their lives, because all of their misfortunes and discontents are the fault of the patriarchy.
Rather than seeking therapeutic help with their personal problems, feminists instead seek scapegoats to blame. Because blame is not a solution, their problems never get better, and the worse their problems are, the more radical their feminism becomes….
Feminism simply does not connect with the experiences of most women, who have a normal pleasure in heterosexual relationships and who do not view men as the oppressive enemy. Whatever their misfortunes and dissatisfactions, normal women do not resort to the scapegoating ideology of radical feminism, for the simple reason that they recognize that scapegoating won’t solve their problems.
Radical feminists are not normal women, however.
They are psychologically and emotionally damaged in some way which makes it impossible for them to cope with their disappointments and, rather than try to repair the damage, they seek instead to console themselves by striking exaggerated postures of victimhood and engaging in extremist hate-talk against men….
-I’m not sure I can add much to what he wrote, except to say that, for the record, this is not a phenomenon restricted to just the Feminists, but, rather, applies in general to all Ideologues.
To cite Jeff Goldstein’s famous [and true] phase: it’s who they are; it’s what they do.
But that is a subject for another time.
-Stacy loves to get the Feminists going by remarking: ‘feminism is an ideology of man-hating Marxist lesbian baby-killers’.
There is no scientific proof that a woman can be born a Lesbian. Therefore, something in a woman’s psychological make-up has to drive her to prefer to have intimate relations with other women. Man-hate is merely a manifestation of the condition, I believe.
The main motivation is Fear Of Men.
Now, said Fear has many causes. To list just two…
= Mistreatment [violent and/or sexual] at the hands of a male adult when a child or teenager. The supreme trauma that such horrible treatment can cause will often lead to a terror of being close to any man in a situation where the woman cannot easily call on people nearby to save her from any aggressions perpetrated by men.
= Fear of the different, the unknown. Such women often are self-enslaved in an extreme shyness that manifests itself in panic attacks or the development of behavioral phobias.
No matter what the cause, those women who possess a Fear Of Men are in the thrall, to varying degrees, of an irrational trepidation, a searing dread.
Some women in such a state of the Fear Of Men, never get married and become Old Maids. While these women are lonely souls, the vast majority of them continue to live and act in the Real World and often become beloved Aunts and admired caretakers of the elderly and the sick and lame. The others lead very sad and empty emotional lives, but they do not cause others to suffer or be miserable because they are miserable.
Some women run to convents and dedicate their lives to be Brides Of Christ — who is perfection and, therefore, the one ‘man’ they can enjoy an intimate relationship with, free of the timidity, anxiety and guilt that encompass them when dealing with actual men. The most traumatized enter a Cloister, while those less riddled with the Fear become regular nuns, where the actual men they are closest to are priests, who are expected to be celibate.
Others are so hysterical that they take the radical [and perverse] step of only having sexual relations with other women. Some of these do not end-up hating men and, while they still fear them, they coexist with them as friends and acquaintances, maintaining what they consider a ‘safe distance’ from any intimate involvement.
But some are so mentally ill — so ‘psychologically and emotionally damaged’ — as Stacy remarked, that, in their mentally deranged condition they lash out at all men, declaring them to be all vile, the personifications of a warped [and, dare I say, ‘deranged’] idea of what Evil is.
Thus, we are confronted with those kind of women that Stacy McCain so brilliantly dissects, and you get Feminists who produce such deranged ravings as this:
No woman is heterosexual. What men call heterosexuality is an institution where men make women captive for PIV [penis-in-vagina], to control our reproductive functions and steal our labour. Heterosexuality, or sexuality with men does not exist, because the only relationship to men that exists is men’s violence, physical and mental invasion — one that men have so well crafted and disguised for so long that we can mistake it for attraction, sexual urges or love. All women’s “attraction” to men is 100% eroticised trauma bonding / stockholm syndrome. There is no other form of attraction to men possible than that. None. Any woman “sexually” or “sentimentally” attached to a man is ONLY trauma-bonded to him. This is a universal rule under patriarchy.
That’s a quote taken from another post by Stacy McCain [well-worth a read, as well, for his insights].
That such obviously mentally unhinged and lunatic women [the name for their condition is Hysteria — yes, I said it] are given any legitimacy by our Society is a sign of just how depraved it has become. And is another telltale sign of The Present Crisis.
Such women desperately need psychological help, not encouragement, which is Inhumane.
[Originally published on 12 February 2014 under the title The Consequences Of Being An Ideologue – Part 69: Feminists]