Skip to content

The Royal Family Is Degenerate

04 August 2019 @ 17:32

This land of such dear souls, this dear dear land,
Dear for her reputation through the world,
Is now leased out, I die pronouncing it,
Like to a tenement or pelting farm:
England, bound in with the triumphant sea
Whose rocky shore beats back the envious siege
Of watery Neptune, is now bound in with shame,
With inky blots and rotten parchment bonds:
That England, that was wont to conquer others,
Hath made a shameful conquest of itself.
Ah, would the scandal vanish with my life,
How happy then were my ensuing death!

John of Gaunt, Richard II, Act II, scene i

As I wrote here the other day:

The ‘normal political process’ is dead. It went to join The Choir Invisible during the 2016 Election Season.

We are now, thanks to the atmospheric changes set loose during The Obama Epoch, a Full-On Democracy. A new show has topped the ratings: The Land Of The Populists.

The same is true for Britain, as we see by the way Boris Johnson got voted-in as Prime Minister [see this other post of mine concerning the Neo-Caesarism that has brought Trump and Boris their success]

The whole system across the pond has become Deranged.  Britain lives in an age when Populism rules their Political Scene.  Since this situation is not likely to improve soon, a balance needs to be achieved that will help preserve the country until and if it rejects Democracy and we see a Restoration of that kind of Parliamentary System that was once the Envy of the World.

That balance I speak of may just save Fair Albion for just a while, but it is no Cure.  The thinking behind it is to plateau The Decline to give Englishmen the time to right themselves.  I’ll admit this is a rather Desperate suggestion, but, with the ‘normal political process’ being KIA, the Brits need this.

I wrote a post back in 2014 that was entitled: Britain Needs A New Royal Family — that phrase says it all.

In that post, I remarked:

It would seem that the Duke Of Cambridge is just as silly and idiotic as his Father, The Prince Of Saving Whales.

Britain is on the [verge] of societal collapse and William is worried about ivory from long-dead elephants?  [BB: Prince William ‘vowed to destroy all 1,200 ivory artefacts in Buckingham Palace to “send a message” to illegal elephant poachers’.]

Now for the past several years, we have been treated to the celebrity show that is the relationship between Harry and Meghan.

This past week sharply showed us — if we ever doubted it — that they’re Politically Correct Hypocritic Dullards, spewing nothing but Leftist Pablum.

-Example #1: Harry…

From The Daily Wire, Joseph Curl reporting, we learn:

A gaggle of A-list celebrities flocked to a posh Italian resort this week for Google Camp, described as a major summit on climate change.

Of course, they did so in the only way liberals do: They flew in on at least 114 private jets, whipped around in gas-guzzling helicopters, motored up in $200 million yachts with 2,300-horsepower engines. Once there, they were ferried around in huge Maserati SUV’s that get 15 miles per gallon.

The three-day event — which reportedly cost $20 million — was super secret. …Even the attendance of Prince Harry — who reportedly delivered an impassioned speech about climate change while barefoot — was never confirmed by Buckingham Palace.

But the Daily Mail reports that a jet was “chartered to bring the royal to Palmero airport, before a helicopter whisked him onwards to the luxury resort of Verdura for the summit, all paid for by Google.”

SIDENOTE: Methinks these celebrities are more Fascist than Liberal, considering this is an example of Corporatism.

-Example #2: Meghan [with a little bit of Harry thrown-in]…

From the Canadian National Post, Karla Adam reporting, we learn:

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, guest-edited the September edition of British Vogue, using her stint at the helm to highlight a collection of diverse women “breaking barriers,” including climate activist Greta Thunberg, primatologist Jane Goodall and New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern.

The edition of the magazine, called “Forces for Change,” features “a collection of trailblazing changemakers, united by their fearlessness in breaking barriers,” Buckingham Palace said in a statement. Meghan is the first person to guest-edit the September issue of the magazine, generally considered to be the fashion bible’s most important of the year.

The magazine also features a “candid conversation” between Meghan and former first lady Michelle Obama, as well as an interview of Goodall by Prince Harry, the palace said.

Hmmm…I smell Lefties — a mixture of patchouli and Fetid Feminist Utopianism.

BTW: I get all of information on serious issues from a fashion bible…don’t you?


…as a senior member of the British royal family, she is nonetheless expected to shy away from party politics and controversial issues.

Mission Not-Accomplished, but, hey, who cares anymore.  Meghan is a CELEBRITY!  Enough with that old and musty set of Traditions, eh?


In total, 15 women are featured on the cover. Meghan asked that one box be left empty to represent a mirror, as a way to include the reader as someone who can effect change.

Meghan also decided not to appear on the cover herself because it would be “boastful,” according to the magazine’s editor in chief, Edward Enninful.

Naw…The Duchess ain’t misbehavin’ — no boastin’ here, no, no.

Notice that the mirror is empty, just like the Left’s heads.  Mirror, mirror on the cover: who’s the most Vacuous one of them all?

I don’t know about you, but right now I’m suffering vaguely from the old Ennui-nful.

In another article in the National Post, written by Sherelle Jacobs [one that shows that the author is no conservative], she remarks [tip of the fedora to Teecee Lynch]:

Among the most sanctimonious myths of our time is the one that, in a BBC gospel drawl, describes Leave voters as “left behind”. The lost souls of this country are, in fact, our bewildered liberal elite. Take the Duchess of Sussex’s decision to edit next month’s Vogue magazine. The act in itself is, of course, an error: this metropolitan bible of gaunt aspiration, pored over with miserable reverence in hair salons across the nation, is one of Britain’s most retrograde luxury brands. But worse still is the edition’s cover, which celebrates 15 women who are “trailblazing change-makers, united by their fearlessness in breaking barriers”.

As suggested by the air-whipping rush of an empty blurb, the selection of females is depthlessly “woke”. It is an uncomfortable non-coincidence that most of the choices happen to be both ethnic minority models or actors, and mediocre “change-makers”. One can only deduce that this problem has arisen because the selections were made on the premise that achievement is uncompelling unless it can be adjectived by exotic origins (Somali female boxer; black ballerina) and comes with a marketable Instagram following.

But the oddest thing about the cover is how it transports us, in a soft Californian hand clasp, to a strangely archaic parallel universe. In this ghoulish place – trapped somewhere between the Kings Road during the Summer of Love of ’67 and the American Deep South – everyone is defined by their race, and fame-ravaged celebrities yearning for a spiritual calling are boundary-pushing “campaigners”.

Harry comes in for a well-deserved hit:

…In the pages of Vogue, Prince Harry has made a Malthusian pledge to help save the planet by only having two children. This worrying celebrity trend is ultimately rooted in a mathematically flawed 18th-century theory of Thomas Malthus, and a somewhat airbrushed interpretation of China’s 37-year dabble in social engineering….

That’s lovely innit: being influenced by the One-Child Policy of Red China, which murdered over 300 million babies through Forced Abortions.


Clearly, then, in a fast-moving world, our bamboozled elite possess neither the optimistic big-picture vision nor the practical skills to analyse and solve the big issues. And so they have retreated into a fantasy world in which they are the moral figureheads and enlightened revolutionaries of an otherwise ignorant, bigoted society. But as a new dawn is ushered in, such lack of self-awareness can only condemn them to further irrelevance.

I disagree with one statement above: the Leftists believe they do have an Optimistic Big-Picture Vision™: they truly believe that the implementation of their fun-house mirror Gnostic Policies will bring about a wonderful world.

The House Of Windsor [actually: The House Of Saxe-Coburg And Gotha] is nothing but a ‘royal’ version of Hollywood.  And like Tinseltown, there no longer exists any Mystery, nothing is Sacred.  Film, TV, and Music Celebrities have learned to ‘play’ this system of Media Intrusion…and so have The Royals.

For a Monarchy to be Legitimate, an air of Mystery must surround it.  That has all but been stripped-away under Elizabeth II.  Please believe me when I say that it pains me to state this about her; I like her and have a certain amount of Respect for the Queen.  But one cannot deny the Truth that the Monarchy during her Reign has become a Farce.

The trouble is: Britain needs a Monarch to tie the Nation together.

And in this Age Of Populism, it needs a conservative Royal Family to balance against the threats posed by Democracy, which is a stage on the way to Fascism.

And, further, Britain needs a Monarch of English blood.

The House Of Saxe-Coburg And Gotha has become Depraved.  It is Degenerate.  [Christ, the Prince Of Wales wants to be a tampon in his wife’s panties.]  More importantly, this Family has become nothing but Celebrities — useless Parasites.

A Proper Monarch in a Constitutional Monarchy is there to be a symbol of the nation and to hold the people of said nation together.  He is a rallying point, most especially when the times are bad [as they are now in Fair Albion] and/or the Politicians cause disruptions.

The current Royal Family is certainly the latter: symbols of a nation destroying itself.  However, it has no rallying power.  And it isn’t English.

An Monarch, born of the soil that made Albion great — infused, in other words, with Englishness — would symbolize and be by his Nature, what the Brits need.

A Conservative English Monarch could Restore the Morality and Mystery of the Monarchy.  And stand as a symbol of The Permanent Things that have sustained England throughout the centuries.

Such a Monarch should be elected by a modern version of The Witan, so that no Family could be assured of continuing in office without the consent of the Noble and Wise Leaders of the country.

As The Flames Of Albion grow in Intensity, it is Imperative that England begin healing itself and be worthy once again of this description:

This royal throne of kings, this scepter’d isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall,
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England….

John of Gaunt, Richard II, Act II, scene i

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: