Skip to content

On Donald Trump And The ‘Jelly-Spined Squishes’

12 July 2015 @ 01:57

I haven’t written a thing about Donald Trump and his candidacy since he made his initial remarks about illegal immigrants from Mexico, but I’ve been gathering my thoughts on him these past few days in anticipation of finally doing so.

And here comes that Mark Steyn fellow to make every point I would have made…and say it more eloquently and wittily than I ever could have [images mine]:

Meanwhile, another old white man is destabilizing the Republican primary. Donald Trump would also be the oldest man elected president, but like Bernie he too seems to be reaching parts of the base the younger and prettier types can’t. Six months out, no predictions are possible about the first states: I assume a George Pataki or Lindsay Graham or two will have fallen by the wayside by January, but a lot of the rest seem to have just enough cash to hang in awhile and it’s not clear there aren’t a couple more still to come. With a dozen or more candidates many of whom are all in the single digits and within the margin of error, you might be able to win New Hampshire with, say, 14 per cent of the vote. In an open primary, if the youth vote is over with the Dems voting for Bernie, an older culturally conservative Perot vote might well show up in the GOP to vote for Trump. Who knows?

But here’s the funny and consequential thing. Trump is supposed to be the narcissist blowhard celebrity candidate: He’s a guy famous for erecting aesthetically revolting buildings with his “brand” plastered all over them, for arm-candy brides, for beauty contests and reality shows. The other fellows are sober, serious senators and governors.

And yet Trump is the only one who’s introduced an issue into this otherwise torpid campaign – and the most important issue of all, I would argue, in that ultimately it’s one of national survival. And so the same media that dismiss Trump as an empty reality-show vanity candidate are now denouncing him for bringing up the only real policy question in the race so far.

mark steyn 10

What he said may or may not be offensive, but it happens to be true: America has more Mexicans than anybody needs, and then some. It certainly has more unskilled Mexicans than any country needs, including countries whose names begin with “Mex-” and end in “-ico”. And it has far more criminal Mexicans than anybody needs, which is why they make up 71 per cent of the foreign inmates in federal jails. Just to underline that last point, a young American woman was murdered for kicks in a supposed “sanctuary city” on the eve of the holiday weekend by an illegal immigrant from Mexico. He had flouted US immigration law for years – or, to be more precise about it, local, state and federal officials had colluded with him in the flouting of US immigration law, to the point where San Francisco’s sheriff actively demanded the return of this criminal to his “sanctuary city”, thereby facilitating the homicide of an actual citizen, taxpayer and net contributor to American society.

This would be quite an interesting topic to air in a US election campaign, don’t you think? Certainly, a segment of voters seems to be interested in it. But bigshot media like NBC and Univision and craphole emporia like Macy’s are telling Trump and everybody else: you can’t even bring this up; this is beyond discussion. The “acceptable” Republican candidates are now obliged to denounce the guy who mentioned the unmentionable: “Will you distance yourself from Trump’s controversial remarks? Do you agree such views have no place in your party?” Needless to say, Reince Preibus and the other jelly-spined squishes of the GOP establishment are eagerly stampeding to do the Macy’s-Univision-industrial complex’s work for them.

The Donald is not really a conservative, nor much of a Republican. He’s given more or less evenhandedly to both parties over the decades, because, at Trump’s level, that’s just the price of doing business in a sclerotic and corrupt republic. The Clintons attended one of his weddings, because, for New York operators, that’s like the King of Spain attending the Prince of Wales’ wedding: it’s just A-list power-schmoozing. Whether the Chinese Politburo would respond positively to a President Trump whose opening conversational gambit is “Now listen, you muthaf**kers” is doubtful.

Yet Trump, like other philosophically erratic politicians from Denmark to Greece, has tapped into a very basic strain of cultural conservatism: the question of how far First World peoples are willing to go in order to extinguish their futures on the altar of “diversity”.

Karl-Rove-IAmADickheadWeasel-365As Ann Coulter’s new book Adios, America! lays out in remorseless detail, Kate Steinle is dead because the entire Democratic Party, two-thirds of the Republican Party and 100 per cent of the diseased federal-state-municipal bureaucracy prioritizes myths over reality. Yes, it’s distressing to persons of taste and discrimination that the only person willing to address that reality is Donald Trump. But that’s because he’s not the reality-show freak here. The fake-o lame-o reality freakshow is the political pseudo-campaign being waged within the restraints demanded by the media and Macy’s. So, if Donald Trump is the only guy willing to bust beyond those bounds, we owe him a debt of gratitude. If, as Karl Rove proposes, other candidates are able to talk about the subject in a more “inclusive” way, so be it. But, if “inclusive” is code for not addressing it at all, nuts to that.

Step back and let’s be bipartisan about what Rove calls the “disruptiveness” factor: Be honest, which would you prefer and which is a bleaker comment on the political health of the republic – Bernie vs the Donald? Or Hillary vs Jeb?

Damn you, Steyn.

  1. Joe Miller (@joethefatman1) permalink
    12 July 2015 @ 09:06 09:06

    I was talking to the better half last night about the various candidates. I think I summed Trump up pretty well. I said: Trump isn’t a republican or a democrat he’s TRUMP. First last and always. He’s all about him. I also noted that he’s done a good thing in shifting the subject from ‘how many can we let stay’ to ‘why are we letting so many in in the first place’. He has made the establishment amnistas have to defend themselves over their paths to citizenship bull. Rubio, Rove and Jeb should be having much deserved nightmares about this and that is a good thing.

    I still wouldn’t vote for Trump to be street sweeper though.

  2. john permalink
    12 July 2015 @ 12:04 12:04

    Do you remember Rush’s Operation Chaos?
    Many Dems will be voting in those early open state primaries
    The longer Trumpis seen as a Republican the better for Dems

  3. 12 July 2015 @ 18:05 18:05

    The problem I have with Trump is that fundamentally, his candidacy is not about the Nation, it’s about him. So I don’t see this as running for the highest office, it’s about Donald Trump increasing his exposure.

    Also, I see Trump as being too much the negative sides of New York to gain much traction in Middle America.


  1. Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup » Pirate's Cove
  2. Jonah Goldberg: How I stopped worrying and learned to love The Donald | Batshit Crazy News

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: