Skip to content

On The Privileged, The Productive, And The Dependent

11 February 2015 @ 20:25

A very interesting — and I believe accurate — set of observations by Stacy McCain:

How often have we noted the correlation between feminism and mental illness? Depression and anxiety seem to be nearly ubiquitous in the feminist movement. Self-harm and eating disorders are also common, and we occasionally encounter diagnoses of personality disorders as well. There is a clear pattern: Young women who view men as irresponsible and untrustworthy “f–kboys,” women whose emotional instability is serious enough to require psychiatric intervention — such are the unhappy women who find that feminism’s hostility to the existing social order offers a rationalization of their discontents.

Have they never read Eric Hoffer’s The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements? Do they not recognize themselves as the frustrated misfits Hoffer described?

Those who see their lives as spoiled and wasted crave equality and fraternity more than they do freedom. If they clamor for freedom, it is but freedom to establish equality and uniformity. . . .
Those who clamor loudest for freedom are often the ones least likely to be happy in a free society. The frustrated, oppressed by their shortcomings, blame their failure on existing restraints. Actually their innermost desire is for an end to the ‘free for all.’ They want to eliminate free competition and the ruthless testing to which the individual is continually subjected in a free society.

So it is that the feminist movement attracts to its banner frustrated women “who see their lives as spoiled and wasted,” women who require a scapegoat to “blame [for] their failure” and who find in feminism’s anti-male ideology a ready-made excuse for their unhappiness. Yet for every miserable misfit grumbling about “masculinity . . . male aggression . . . male arrogance . . . male mediocrity” on the Internet, there are many more happy women going about their normal lives, without mental illness and without feminism. If we compared the objective circumstances of any two women, one self-identifying as feminist and the other rejecting the “feminist” label, what difference would distinguish them?

Are anti-feminist women on average more “privileged” than the militant man-haters? I seriously doubt it. In fact, I think generally the opposite is true: One does not commonly encounter working-class women reading Judith Butler and ranting about the gender binary and the heterosexual matrix. Whatever the normal woman’s complaints about her relationships with men, she does not construe her problems in terms of academic theory and political ideology.

Indeed, she does not.  The Non-Feminist Woman tends to take Life as it comes, to not deny what it is, to not seek to impose abnormalities on it.

I would add, however, that there is a third group of women who, while they are not privileged or within the direct influence of the academics, are very susceptible to the Hysteric rantings of the Judith Butlers of this World: uneducated women who also lack Common Sense.  These are women without any desire to do the Spiritual and physical work necessary to better themselves.  Consequently, they tend to occupy low-skilled and low-paying jobs or to be denizens of the Welfare System.

Take several hours and scan the crime reports from localities across the country and you will notice an interesting pattern when it comes to crimes committed by Lesbians on Lesbians: they are either Privileged Feminists or, for lack of a better term, members of the Lower Class.

This situation mirrors American Society as a whole in that we can divide it’s members up into three general groups: the Privileged [or ‘Ruling Class’ or ‘Elites’], the Productive, and the Dependent [or ‘Sheeples’].

The third group of women I described above clearly are part of the Dependents.  They and their non-Lesbian fellow Wards of the Privileged are often called ‘Low Information Voters’, meaning they are very, very susceptible to the cunning lies of the Elites — in fact, they want to be Subjects of a Ruling Class that handles all the dirty work of Life for them.  These are also the people who worship Narcissists like Oprah or ‘Obama’, who care only to lose themselves in the frivolities and luxuries the Productive group provides through their creation of wealth, prosperity, and Freedom and Ordered Liberty.

The Privileged, with the help of the Dependent, have seized Power And Control in America.  And that is one of the main reasons we find ourselves slipping into enslavement.

…the philosopher Alfred North Whitehead thought it self-evident that you would get a good government if you took power out of the hands of the acquisitive and gave it to the learned and the cultivated. At present, a child in kindergarten knows better than that

—Eric Hoffer, Before The Sabbath

The history of this country was made largely by people who wanted to be left alone. Those who could not thrive when left to themselves never felt at ease in America.

—Eric Hoffer, Reflections On The Human Condition

 

10 Comments leave one →
  1. 12 February 2015 @ 07:44 07:44

    Here in The Great South Land, while we respect the opinions of both Stacy McCain and Eric Heffer – and of course, the Bobertian host of this blog – we don’t draw such fine distinctions. To us, all feminists are frightbats.
    They shriek, they rage, they cheer, they despair, they exult, they scream, they laugh, they cry! There’s never a non-emotional moment in the lives of Australia’s left-wing ladies’ auxiliary, whose psychosocial behavioural disorders are becoming ever more dramatic following Tony Abbott’s election.

    • thecampofthesaints permalink
      12 February 2015 @ 08:06 08:06

      While I cannot speak for the late, great Mr. Hoffer, I can assure you that both Stacy and yours truly believe that Feminism is a subset of Leftism. Therefore, ALL who wave the banner of it are Moonbats / Frightbats, to varying degrees.

      On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:44 AM, The Camp Of The Saints wrote:

      >

    • Adobe_Walls permalink
      12 February 2015 @ 16:32 16:32

      Frightbats now that’s a keeper.

      • Zohydro permalink
        12 February 2015 @ 21:23 21:23

        I’ve submitted “frightbat” to UrbanDictionary.com!

        • Zohydro permalink
          12 February 2015 @ 22:18 22:18

          The buggers rejected it! I have several definitions there, never rejected, and but one taken down only after having been up (and positively rated!) for several years!

        • 12 February 2015 @ 23:35 23:35

          Didn’t you mean to write ‘buggerers’?

  2. Zohydro permalink
    12 February 2015 @ 21:03 21:03

    “Frightbat”—That’s a new one for me! A corruption of “fruit bat”, I suppose…

Trackbacks

  1. On The Privileged, The Productive, And The Dependent | That Mr. G Guy's Blog
  2. Muslims Murdered in NC: Sarah Palin Has Alibi | Regular Right Guy

Leave a Reply [Go on...I double-dog dare you]

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: