Skip to content

@SECupp Suffers Mental Breakdown

14 February 2013 @ 19:42

TonyHancock-Really-b2That’s the only explanation I can think of for her uttering these words [tips of the fedora to Jen Kuznicki and Jeanne Bodine]:

[W]e can’t be afraid to call out Rush Limbaugh,” said…S. E. Cupp, a New York Daily News columnist and a co-host of”The Cycle”on MSNBC. “If we can get three Republicans on three different networks saying, ‘What Rush Limbaugh said is crazy and stupid and dangerous,’ maybe that’ll give other Republicans cover” to denounce the talk-show host as well.

This is what happens, people, when you hang around with Bolsheviks all day.

Another conservative jumps the shark.

  1. theebl permalink
    14 February 2013 @ 20:10 20:10

    There is a degree of Stockholm syndrome when a conservative gets hired by a liberal outfit that sadly seems inevitable.. A few can hold out a while but even Buchanan just ended up going nutty and Jew-hatey after a while.

  2. theebl permalink
    14 February 2013 @ 20:15 20:15

    Even the great Rush Limbaugh can say things you disagree with. That is fine. Rush has broad shoulders and it is water off a duck’s back. But S.E. Cupp went way beyond such criticism with her statement. This is pandering to the MSNBC audience (and MSNBC powers that be that write her pay check).

    They would say the same thing goes on reciprocally when misguided Democrat Kristen Powers makes sense on Fox. Of course, that is just Kirsten soaking in some common sense.

  3. 14 February 2013 @ 23:08 23:08

    She’s pimping her husband’s GOP study group, and would apparently bus chuck anybody in the way… major credibility hit for SEC

  4. 14 February 2013 @ 23:20 23:20

    Karl Rove made his first buy…

  5. M. Thompson permalink
    15 February 2013 @ 01:25 01:25

    Telling someone on our side he’s wrong and why: good, especially if it’s something big.

    Calling for attacks on someone theoretically on the same out of jealousy or fit in with the Bolshies: very bad. There’s too much at stake for backstabbing.

    If I was Rush, I’d ask her to come on my show and have as pleasant a conversation as possible explaining her attack. She’d have a much larger audience than normal. Finally, there’s too damn many Bolshiveks to be throwing knives into each others at any point in time.

  6. 15 February 2013 @ 10:07 10:07

    I never really liked her, guess now I know why.

  7. indyjonesouthere permalink
    15 February 2013 @ 11:32 11:32

    I appreciate rino’s exposing themselves to conservatives. And like an old age streaker they will find it hard to re-cover and re-image what most already suspected was there. Eye bleach helps though.

  8. Adobe_Walls permalink
    15 February 2013 @ 16:22 16:22

    Just another Republican not a conservative, operation Whig continues.

  9. 16 February 2013 @ 01:40 01:40

    Personally, I never understood the appeal of her. She’s hot, yes, but what does she have to contribute? She was never interesting and always a bit of a weenie.

  10. JDP permalink
    16 February 2013 @ 03:38 03:38

    this is, unfortunately, the Republican post-election approach: all cosmetics. if only we made it clear we’re not one of _those_ conservatives, the electorate will like us.

    it doesn’t seem to occur to people like S.E. Cupp that large swaths of the public currently do not agree with Republican policy. people’re fixated on hot-button cultural issues they personally disagree with, but it’s not as though the GOP’s economic vision is super-appealing either — and yet IIRC the only thing she was focused on last go around was debt, debt, debt, as if the GOP should only exist for that reason, without effectively selling any broader economic vision.

    the irony is that Limbaugh is pretty much the least incendiary conservative talk show host out there. of course he’s the most known, so it makes sense, but compared to Levin’s squawking and Michael Savage’s conspiracy-mongering he keeps things pretty light, just has fun at liberals’ expense.

  11. 16 February 2013 @ 13:06 13:06

    Color me entirely unsurprised.

  12. 17 February 2013 @ 08:47 08:47

    So for over twenty years, while Rush has been the only conservative to consistently beat back the Left (with half his brain tied behind his back), the Democrat Machine Media has failed to take him down (with an occasional attempt at an assist from the federal government itself) and now S.E. Cupp thinks she can touch off a Rush failure cascade if she can get three different David Brooks’s on three different networks to say bad things about him?


    Yes, Mizz Cupp, yer pritty, but yer not THAT pritty.

  13. Jonesy permalink
    18 February 2013 @ 01:05 01:05

    What a shameless way to try and get attention…Well, at least she has let us know she is a traitor.

  14. Fred permalink
    20 February 2013 @ 03:55 03:55

    I see hotter women every day in the mall, Wal-Mart or the gas station. I could sniff her liberalism on Greg Gutfeld’s Red Eye show before she ever received her 30 pieces of silver from PMSDNC. Mary Katherine Ham or any random Fox News gal is far prettier and smarter.

  15. Veritas permalink
    21 February 2013 @ 17:46 17:46

    SE CUpp is that a really small bra?

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: