Skip to content

Obama Comes Out Of The Closet [Updated Below]

10 May 2012 @ 14:47

[Yeah, yeah…I know someone’s probably already used that title, but, dammit, I like it.]

In a move, of which there is no doubt that his motivations were the exact opposite of noble, our divine Julius Obamacus Nero Caesar has decreed that he supports the fiction known as ‘gay marriage’.

He was for it before he was against it before he was for it again.

The narrative Obama and his minions are trying to sell us, like we’re incredibly stupid, is two-parted: (1) he has been thinking long and hard [!] about this issue, weighing it very deliberately and with magnificent candor and (2) Joe Biden’s remarks in favor of ‘gay marriage’ on Sunday forced his hand [although, they seem to be backing off from this one as of today].

Of course, as you’ve come to expect with, specifically, Comrade Obamnin and, generally, with the Left, none of this is true.

Poof—The Magic Negro was feeling incredible pressure from his many homosexual doners and from their friends in the Entertainment Industry to make this move. In fact, as the Washington Free Beacon reports:

Left-wing blogger Greg Sargent reported on Monday that “leading gay and progressive donors” were angry with Obama over his increasingly convoluted position on gay rights and same-sex marriage, and were refusing to donate any more money to Priorities USA, the pro-Obama Super PAC….

The Washington Post noted on Tuesday that roughly 20 percent of Obama top campaign bundlers—who are responsible for arranging $500,000 and up—“publicly identified themselves as gay.”

Obama’s announcement fits a pattern of changing positions on major issues for what appear to be financially motivated reasons.


-Tip of the fedora to Stacy McCain [noted evil heterosexual who can’t color coordinate to save his life] for the above item. He comments:

What is pathetic, as I say, is that everybody knows Obama could not have won even the Iowa caucus in 2008 if he had been campaigning as openly pro-gay-marriage — that is to say, clearly to the left of Hillary Clinton on this issue.

In order to enhance his “viability,” the media bit their tongues and looked the other way while Obama engaged in a flimflam charade of moderation. He would have carried on that dishonest scam as long as necessary to win the general election, except that his big-money gay donors threatened to cut him off. And what his media idolators now will celebrate as another “gutsy call” never would have happened otherwise!

Call Barry, Old Dud And Guts.

-As The Lonely Conservative comments:

Boy, the Obama campaign couldn’t have played this any better. They had VP Joe Biden go out and make comments in support of gay marriage. The head of the education department echoed those thoughts. They got everyone all in a tizzy leading up to O’s pronouncement that he “personally” supports gay marriage – and wham! – their biggest fundraisers haul in $1,000,000 in under two hours.

-One of the things Barry said in the interview was: ‘Well– you know, I have to tell you, as I’ve said, I’ve– I’ve been going through an evolution on this issue’.

Like all truly intelligent, insightful, and witty men, you don’t want to be subject to John O’Sullivan’s withering sarcasm. Here he contemplates Obama’s evolution:

Do other people find this notion of an “evolving” opinion as fascinating as I do? This is not a simple matter of someone changing his mind. We all do that on occasion. But the very words we use tell us that we are in charge of the process and that we have ended up at some definite point. But an evolving opinion seems to be something for which the opinion-former is not really responsible. It is more or less external to him. It sits there, maybe on a table in his office, maybe hidden away in a locked room, gradually changing its shape, perhaps pulsating, or giving off “vibes,” or sending forth a blue light, or emitting little electronic signals as yet indecipherable but likely — once we have mastered the code — to inform us how and as what the opinion will finally crystallize.

Ah, there’s that erroneous “finally” again. My apologies. Evolution doesn’t stop in nature. It just keeps rolling along. So what will the president and vice president do if their opinions out there reach the stage of endorsing same-sex marriage but then, instead of stopping and resting, well, keep on evolving? Imagine that their joint opinion, relentlessly expanding Blob-like, and bursting through the walls of its cell, escapes entirely from their control and begins to take all manner of weird shapes, polygamy say, or polyandry, or marriage with inanimate objects (no crude male sexist jokes, please). It might be terribly embarrassing. What would the first lady think? What would the president say? Let me guess.

“Don’t worry, darling. It’s just my opinion talking. Nothing serious. The doctors assure me that it will stop evolving as soon as we have an election.”

See! Barack Hussein Obama has no control over his opinion on this matter, just like, if the mission to kill Osama Bin Laden had failed, he would have had no responsibility at all for that failure.

[Remind me never to make Mr. O’Sullivan mad]

-Here’s another excerpt that only a few keen observers caught initially [and I wasn’t one of them][emphasis mine]:

But I have to tell you that over the course of— several years, as I talk to friends and family and neighbors. When I think about— members of my own staff who are incredibly committed, in monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together. When I think about— those soldiers or airmen or marines or— sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf— and yet, feel constrained, even now that Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is gone, because— they’re not able to— commit themselves in a marriage.

Elliott Abrams comments:

But Mr. Obama actually did bare his soul unintentionally today (perhaps the Biden disease is catching) with his astonishing characterization of American fighting men and women, whom he referred to as “those soldiers or airmen or marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf.” Really?

Most Americans thought they were fighting for the country, not on Barack Obama’s behalf. Slip of the tongue, to be sure, but can one think of another president who’d have made it? They are fighting under his command, under his orders, to be sure, but this particular locution is offensive and solipsistic. Mr. Obama has switched his position on the sanctity of marriage back and forth and has a new one, again, today, revealed when politics made that advisable to him and to his campaign. Whether this is the end or he will “evolve” some more is anyone’s guess.

But let’s leave our soldiers out of this. They aren’t fighting for Mr. Obama and his campaign, and no one sent them out to risk their lives to win same sex “marriage.”

You’re being too kind, Mr. Abrams. By his slip of the tongue, we got to see what Obama really thinks of the position he is in. He believes he is like a Roman Emperor and that, therefore, the military is loyal to him and not to the nation.

By his slip of the tongue, we got to see that this man is dangerous to the point that it is imperative that he be impeached.

Obama is a Tyrant.

-I’ll update this sucker later, but I have some things to get done over the next few hours. Please check back in later on.

UPDATE at 2037…

It’s later!…

-At one point in the fellation, er, interview, our Wise Fearless Leader said:

And what you’re seeing is, I think, states working through this issue— in fits and starts, all across the country. Different communities are arriving at different conclusions, at different times. And I think that’s a healthy process and a healthy debate. And I continue to believe that this is an issue that is gonna be worked out at the local level, because historically, this has not been a federal issue, what’s recognized as a marriage.

Well, well, well…Obama is in favor of Federalism [ie: State’s Rights] — who knew?

Mmm…sounds like his white side is warring with his black side.

-But that didn’t stop him from taking full advantage of the situation, nor from trying to dictate The Narrative.

Stacy McCain, who is on the Campaign’s mailing list, got an e-mail from them overnight.  It begins:

Robert –

Today, I was asked a direct question and gave a direct answer:

I believe that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry.

I hope you’ll take a moment to watch the conversation, consider it, and weigh in yourself on behalf of marriage equality….

You can read the rest here, but I did want to quote this disgrace of a human being’s use of our Armed Forces in his begging letter:

…Through our efforts to end the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, I’ve gotten to know some of the gay and lesbian troops who are serving our country with honor and distinction.

Stacy’s retort is dead solid perfect:

“I’ve gotten to know some of the gay and lesbian troops who are serving our country with honor and distinction” — these are the only members of the armed forces to whom he’s ever spoken. The Navy SEALs who took out Osama bin Laden? He didn’t give them any credit when he was spiking the football on the one-year anniversary, but he’s gotta make sure to give credit to the “honor and distinction” of The Gay and Lesbian Troops, so that gay people will write checks for his re-election campaign.

-Commenting on the interview, William Jacobson remarks:

…Obama couches his cynical ploy in the form of righteousness, bravery and hope. He’s just feeding opiates to the masses.

Well, hey, that’s what Marxists do.

My advice: By stock in Soma.

-At another point in the brown-nosing, er, interview, the Father Of His Fundamentally Transformed Country says:

You know, Malia and Sasha, they’ve got friends whose parents are same-sex couples. And I— you know, there have been times where Michelle and I have been sittin’ around the dinner table. And we’ve been talkin’ [Bob: the brother be shuckin’ and jivin’!] and— about their friends and their parents. And Malia and Sasha would— it wouldn’t dawn on them that somehow their friends’ parents would be treated differently. It doesn’t make sense to them. And— and frankly— that’s the kind of thing that prompts— a change of perspective. You know, not wanting to somehow explain to your child why somebody should be treated— differently, when it comes to— the eyes of the law.

I wonder how Barry and Lady Michbeth will react if the two girls turn Lesbian?  Perhaps like a tolerant Cher did when Chastity announced it?  Or when the girl decided to have her ‘sex-change’ operation???  [Tip of the fedora to John Nolte for both of those links.]

-A Final Word: It is, I think, important not to forget that the Left’s desire to force the fantasy known as ‘gay marriage’ on America is all part of their grander scheme and desire to bring The West down, to destroy it’s foundations, it’s pillars. Their efforts on behalf of this issue are just another part of their march through all of our institutions, this time involving stomping in their jackboots down the wedding aisle.

Resist we much.

  1. 10 May 2012 @ 17:24 17:24

    If you’re conservative, it’s called a flip-flop. If you’re liberal, your views have “evolved.”

    • 10 May 2012 @ 22:28 22:28

      We’re just so gosh darn evil, how can we stand ourselves?

      • 11 May 2012 @ 11:04 11:04

        Some days it’s a real challenge.

  2. 10 May 2012 @ 17:28 17:28

    By his slip of the tongue, we got to see that this man is dangerous to the point that it is imperative that he be impeached.

    Was that necessary Bob? Now I need brain bleach.

  3. M. Thompson permalink
    10 May 2012 @ 20:37 20:37

    It’s also about the money. He’s got the blacks in his pocket (racial unity, no matter how contrived), but he doesn’t want the white urban progressive crowd to stay home, and not give him money. That’s why he made this ‘announcement.’

    Being a younger commenter, (under 30), I’m rather agnostic on this subject, and believe the right response is for state level decisions, made by legislation or referendum. I personally find the whole concept of gay ‘marriage’ absurd, but then I find the mania for bad pop stars and teen idols to be absurd as well. It’s also a disdain for being told I am required to take someone’s morality. Those who cry loudest for keeping the government out of moral issues are sometimes the loudest. The citizens of Cook County, Minnesota should be allowed to make decisions that are different from those of Cook County, Illinois.

    • M. Thompson permalink
      10 May 2012 @ 21:29 21:29

      Darn it, I left a key phrase out. I meant to put “Those who cry loudest for keeping the government out of enforcing traditional morality are sometimes the loudest for enforcing their own.”

      • 10 May 2012 @ 22:30 22:30

        How are you young whippersnappers gonna learn if you don’t make mistakes?

    • 10 May 2012 @ 22:33 22:33

      I was going to comment on the black vote, but it was getting late and I wanted to get the Update published.

      Sadly, despite the fact that a significant number of black voters are religious, I think so many of them have allowed themselves to be so brainwashed by the Dems that they will vote for Obama despite his embracing of the gays.

      • Adobe_Walls permalink
        10 May 2012 @ 23:10 23:10

        He’ll lose some of them. To many Christians of all races homosexuality is a sin period, I don’t expect many Blacks who voted for him to vote against but more than a few will choose faith in God over faith in #OccupyResoluteDesk and sit it out.

        • M. Thompson permalink
          11 May 2012 @ 09:16 09:16

          Those who believe in Liberation ‘Theology’ will not break ranks with Mr Obama come hell or high water. About all that will happen is many of them will stay home, a possible loss of voter for him.

        • 12 May 2012 @ 13:37 13:37


  4. 11 May 2012 @ 07:49 07:49

    He’s been on the down low for decades!
    His next book, ghost written by rue paul “50 shades of Gay”.

  5. Rosalie permalink
    11 May 2012 @ 19:45 19:45

    He might be getting more money now but losing votes later (I hope).


  1. Obama’s Gay Marriage Distraction Paid Off | The Lonely Conservative
  2. Teeing it up: A Round at the LINKs (Mother’s Day edition) | SENTRY JOURNAL

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: