CPAC Is Whack – #IStandWithPamGeller
Pam Geller explains how she was treated:
This year, I applied to speak and was ignored. I tried to get a room for an AFDI event, “The War on Free Speech” and was ignored. So, for the first time in five years, I won’t be at CPAC. Last year Suhail Khan bragged out loud that he (and his other operatives) had successfully kept Robert Spencer and me from being invited to speak. He went so far as to warn people not to attend our events or read our books.
In several articles I took on Grover Norquist and his powerful influence over CPAC….
Norquist is on the board of the American Conservative Union, which runs CPAC.
As I have chronicled here at TCOTS, this man is, at best, a Dhimmi, a Dupe of Islam; at worst, he is a Fellow Traveller who sympathizes with the Mohammedins and works to provide them with legitimacy when they are nothing but savage murderers.
His extensive [and damning] file over at Discover The Networks may be found by clicking here.
The courageous Trevor Loudon has more on Norquist here.
The Investigative Project On Terrorism’s files on him may be found here.
Mark Steyn is not pleased with the ACU:
…I know nothing about the organization’s internal machinations, but the latest expulsion I take personally. On the only occasion I’ve ever spoken at CPAC, I had the honor of being introduced by Pamela Geller. Back then, some fellows were trying to rule her beyond the pale and leaning on me to get her kicked off the much coveted (ha!) Steyn-intro spot. I told ‘em to take a hike: She’s a fearless fighter on free speech and other issues, and I wish there were more with her spirit. Yet five years on it seems she too is unacceptable to CPAC.
Donald Douglas has been covering this story since it broke a few days ago. You can read all of his posts on it by clicking here.
The ACU is putting on this show and has a right to invite and not invite who they want to.
I wish there were an alternative conference because the stain of that Dhimmi Norquist — who is not simply, like GOProud, someone I disagree with, but is, in fact, providing aid and comfort to our enemies — has tarnished CPAC so deeply.
The treatment of Pam Geller is despicable.
She is one of the bravest and most fearless warriors in our struggle to save The West from destruction. At great personal cost, she has refused to allow the forces of Totalitarianism [ie: the Left In America and Islam] to spew their lies and deceptions freely without being challenged. Mrs. Geller is truly doing The Lord’s Work.
I leave you with something I wrote in February of 2010:
The reason I am being very hard-ass about Norquist is because
1) I grew up during the final decades of The Cold War and also spent a great deal of time researching the earlier years of it. It wrecked a great deal of damage across the world. And the world has never recovered from it.
2) I well remember the damage done to use by the fellow-travellers, dupes, and useful idiots — and this was only a cold not a hot conflict. The Jihadists are waging a seeringly hot war against The West. Many have died. Many have been maimed. In The Cold War, the peoples of The West got off relatively easy, but in this conflict we are engaged in a battle against a foe that will only accept our deaths or enslavement. While life under the Soviets was harsh and often cruel, it is a nothing compared to a life lived under the Dhimmitude.
Anyone who aides and abets Islam is a traitor to Western Civilization. Islam is not and never has been a ‘religion of peace’. It has always been a savagedom of barbarity.
How long will conservatives continue to treat Grover Norquist as if he is worthy of being a part of a movement that seeks to preserve, protect, and defend The Constitution and everything America stands for?
How long will we let this modern Kapo [yes, I called him that!] get away with being an evangelist for and a servant of our enemies?