Skip to content

Loser Of The Week

18 March 2010 @ 17:32
by

This time we award the title to JESSE JAMES who prefers this…

…to this…

JESSE JAMES: YOU ARE A LOOSA!

from → Anti-RULE 5, Loser Of The Week, New York Post, RULE 5
16 Comments leave one →
  1. Rob De Witt permalink
    18 March 2010 @ 17:46 17:46

    W, ah say, TF?

    Although the lovely Miss Bullock cannot be held entirely blameless for hooking up with this scroat in the first place.

    She did, after all, sign up.

    Reply
    • bobbelvedere permalink*
      18 March 2010 @ 19:16 19:16

      Quite. But he betrayed her for what? A skank whore with not even an ounce of physicial appeal. And, after reading an interview with her, not an atom of sexiness. Miss Bullock deserves a nice conservative or libertarian man.

      Reply
      • Rob De Witt permalink
        19 March 2010 @ 10:16 10:16

        Weelll….maybe.

        She would certainly seem to be a lovely and sympathetic girl, and the paint job is unarguably above reproach.

        I can pretty much guarantee you, though, that anybody who polishes up his armor and rides to the rescue of a fair maid currently embroiled with a douchebag like this clown will probably discover that nothing happens in a vacuum. A woman of her age who’s still embroiled with this kind of soap opera almost certainly has a history of, ah, “inappropriate attachments.”

        Jesse the Slutlover has a rap sheet the size of a phone book, and the story just gets gaudier the more you read. I would be astonished if this chick just stumbled into this mess in all innocence, and I’ll bet you lunch (Burger King on a Wednesday, when my Senior Discount will cover the damages) this isn’t the first time she’s found a way to abase herself with somebody who treats her like dirt.

        The shrinks used to have a bit of shorthand for the roles assumed by anybody who attempts to raise a Princess from the mud. In sequence, they’re Rescuer, Perpetrator, Victim. Any gal who ignores the kind of warning flags raised by a criminal of this magnitude obviously has some kind of need for ugliness, and anybody who can’t supply it will soon find that she can generate sufficient drama on her own to lay waste to all and sundry if he ignores it long enough. And you’re the handiest target, aren’t you? Any guesses on who’ll get blamed by Poor Sandra the next time?

        Wanna get your heart broke? Put your honor at the service of a Drama Queen with a track record that makes you queasy when you’re paying attention. Guess how I learned that.

        Reply
        • bobbelvedere permalink*
          19 March 2010 @ 11:23 11:23

          Wanna get your heart broke? Put your honor at the service of a Drama Queen with a track record that makes you queasy when you’re paying attention. Guess how I learned that.

          Ah…you read a lot?

  2. Ran / Si Vis Pacem permalink
    18 March 2010 @ 19:45 19:45

    Bob…
    …followed you over to WordPress. There was a time when Google’s motto “Don’t be Evil” had something other than hypocrisy all over it.

    Reply
  3. Reaganite Republican permalink
    19 March 2010 @ 10:10 10:10

    Wow, that’s a hard way to go… yuk!

    Maybe he bumped his head or something…?

    Reply
    • bobbelvedere permalink*
      19 March 2010 @ 11:21 11:21

      …or was dropped on his when he was a baby.

      Reply
  4. Cousin Sam permalink
    19 March 2010 @ 23:26 23:26

    Perhaps he was taking douchebag lessons from Hugh Grant? The guy who cheated on this:

    Liz Hurley

    with this “professional” lady:

    Divine Brown

    At least Jesse’s mistress only *looks* like a diseased two-bit hooker.

    Reply
    • bobbelvedere permalink*
      19 March 2010 @ 23:31 23:31

      Are you sure she only looks the part?

      Reply
      • Cousin Sam permalink
        19 March 2010 @ 23:50 23:50

        Sure – she cost him a lot more than two bits.

        Reply
  5. bobbelvedere permalink*
    20 March 2010 @ 18:18 18:18

    TheBlanque makes some good points from the trenches over at his posting linked above. I left a comment over there that I would like to quote:

    Good points [thanks for the link], but one thing that gets forgotten in all of this is that Jesse James gave his word in the sight of God and family and friends that he would be faithful. He therefore has a moral obligation not to stray and, if he wanted to stray, then he had the option of ending the marriage. He chose to be dishonorable, to cast honor aside. As men, we have an duty to try and be noble for the sake of preserving civilization.

    Reply
  6. CousinSam permalink
    21 March 2010 @ 13:42 13:42

    I don’t think we’ve forgotten it, we’re just not surprised. A man who cheats on his wife has neither honor nor character – we know that, but we also know that lack of honor and lack of character are unfortunately very common characteristics in society, which makes that aspect of the story a “dog bites man” story. A man who cheats on a Helen of Troy with a Snake-headed Medusa, that’s a “man bites dog” story.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Retro Rule Five: Nue à la Plage redux « Si Vis Pacem
  2. Infidelity and prole drift
  3. We all seek our own comfort level. « Starting from the Middle of the Story

Leave a Reply [Go on...I double-dog dare you]

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 374 other followers