Skip to content

S P E C I A L - N O T I C E S . . .

MARIZELA PEREZ IS STILL MISSING: For the latest news on the search for this young lady, please visit the special website that has been set-up: FindMarizela.com. Her cousin, Michelle Malkin has more pictures of her here.
______________________________________________________________
For The Latest News on the KIMBERLIN / RAUHAUSER SAGA: Follow John Hoge's blog HOGEWASH. He's doing one huckuva job covering the story.
______________________________________________________________
Over at the Conservative Hideout, Matt Ross is keeping track of Racial Violence in America.

Matters Hillary

19 April 2014 @ 00:01

-This womyn is about to become a Grandmother:

Hillary-WickedWitch-001x

Poor kid.

But I wish the child and Mother well and hope that Chelsea’s pregnancy is untroubled.

However, the kid’s Grandmother remain fair game for ridicule, as do, of course, her Leftist comrades, as Iowahawk well understands:

And…

From others…

And…

-We learned this Evening that Hillary Rodham has a possible connection with a male homosexual pedophile ring in HollyGotWood.

From a report by Stacy McCain, over at The American Spectator:

…Singer has also hosted notoriously raucous gay parties at the home of film director Roland Emmerich, the London Daily Mail reported. In a 2011 interview with the Advocate, a leading gay publication, Emmerich described how Singer invited hundreds of “twinks” — slang for very young gay men — to the annual pool parties at Emmerich’s Hollywood estate. The paper highlighted a photo showing scores of men frolicking in Emmerich’s swimming pool.

It was at Emmerich’s estate in June 2007 that Hillary Clinton attended an “LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) fundraiser event” for her Democrat presidential campaign. A description of the event: “The Senator first greeted the VIP guests in the upper section of the estate and then moved on to the pool area to address the approximately 250 supporters who have gathered to meet the former First Lady. Hillary Clinton’s main topic that night was the discrimination of gays and lesbians and their (mostly lost) rights, which she is fighting to restore.”…

For background on the allegations against movie director Bryan Singer and producer Roland Emmerich, see another report by Stacy here.

Stacy has just filed a follow-up report over at his place on his TAS article.

A highlight:

Now, am I saying that every gay person in Hollywood is a pedophile, or that Democrats endorse the kind of activities alleged in Michael Egan’s lawsuit? Nothing of the kind.

What I am saying is that the Democrat Party has been collecting money to advance an agenda, and that some of the people providing that money are alleged to have an agenda of butt-raping teenage boys.

Any comment, Comrade Rodham?

HRC-Stalin-02s

-Related Item: from Iowahawk, we learn this about an alleged pederast:

-

Thought For The Day

18 April 2014 @ 18:56

Guest post by The Reverend David R. Graham, A.M.D.G…

Good Friday 2014

The Rev. David R. Graham
Adwaitha Hermitage
18 April 2014

The center of Christianity is the Cross of Jesus the Christ. Christianity is a Power of Being. The Cross symbolizes and is that Power.

Christianity is rightly hated by the self-important. It condemns elites, exclusives, preferreds. Of any kind, any status, any pretension.

Today is Good Friday in the Power of the Cross Anno Domini 2014. In my mind’s eye I eye St. Francis Xavier lifting high the Cross before Indian villagers, declaring It their liberation. Why would he do such a thing?

Why indeed. An engine of torture, admonishment and death. The sign of a loser. What idiot would declare such a thing the gateway to life? What moron would hand the defiant instant justification for their mockery?

Christianity announces a horror as health and a paradox as paradise.

Somehow it seems to make sense. On what, indeed, does Christianity pronounce crucifixion unto death? What is this Power against? What hateth it? Who is the bad guy Christianity wants dead?

For indeed It does want someone dead. Christianity is a lethal hunting expedition for a culprit, a true menace to society, a very real enemy of life. No wonder evil doers hate Christianity. Christianity hates them. The hatred is mutual.

But it is not equal. Christianity hates this bad guy harder, with more determination and more everlastingly than this bad guy can ever hope or even dream to hate Christianity. The struggle is unequal.

The bad guy in the crosshairs is Ego. Ego Christianity wants on the Cross. The Power of the Cross exceeding the power of ego is the Good News of the Gospel.

Ego Christianity wants dead. Permanently. What remains after crucifixion of Ego Christianity calls Resurrection. One is the same but different: life full and healthy because sans Ego. Moreover, life sub specie aeternitatis, Eternal Life.

Christianity is war on Ego. Today is Good Friday. The day the Power of Being that is Christianity declares victory in that war. The death of Ego on the Cross is Christianity’s moment of victory over Ego throughout all dimensions of existence. The moment of Jesus the Christ’s death on the Cross … that is, the moment a Christian’s or anyone else’s Ego is crossed out … is the moment Creation can stand before God in pure humility ready for reunion through rebirth.

AMDG

[Please check out The Rev's fine blog Theological Geography.]

Cliven Bundy: Brother-In-Arms

16 April 2014 @ 21:05

In a post from earlier today, Jeff Goldstein looks at the bigger struggle that is being played-out throughout the whole of The United States and why Cliven Bundy’s war is our war.

An excerpt:

Say what you want about the civil disobedience being deployed by Mr Bundy in the slimy world of cronyism that marks so much of Nevada politics; but the fact is, the stand he’s taking, while it may eschew federal court rulings, is nonetheless worth supporting, if only because it draws attention to the draconian means the federal bureaucracies are prepared to use to harass individual private property owners — even as the amount of undeveloped land in the US remains at about 95%, a staggering figure.  As was the 200 armed enforcement officers with weapons the government deployed to try to neutralize this heretic.

I highly recommend reading all of Jeff’s post because, like me, you’ll be provided with some very powerful ammunition which will aide in combating those in this country who want to eliminate Private Property.

Mark Steyn from yesterday:

So the blandly named “Bureau of Land Management” is managing an area the size of Belgium, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Portugal combined. Just in Nevada.

In total, the Bureau of Land Management rules over one-eighth of the land mass of the United States. That’s about the size of South Africa – or about three-sevenths of the G7: France, Germany and Italy combined.

You know the way governors like to say, “If California were a country…” or “if Texas were a country…” it would be the twelfth biggest economy in the world or whatever it is? If the Bureau of Land Management were a country, it would be the 26th biggest country in the world – out of 200 or so. Maybe that’s why the BLM needs such a lavishly equipped army…. Maybe it should join Nato and send a division or two to protect the Baltic states.

If BLM were Microsoft or Standard Oil, there’d be an anti-trust investigation. Instead, the BLMpire is the biggest collective farm in history, beyond the wildest dreams of Soviet commissars. Except that, as the Bundys have discovered, no one’s allowed to farm it. It’s serfdom without the perks.

The incoming Emir of the United BLM-irates is apparently some buddy of Harry Reid. Where do you go to vote him out? In the one-eighth of the United States he reigns over, there is not a single polling station. And in the seven-eighths where there are, he’s not on the ballot.

Poor old Cliven Bundy is probably doomed to end his days in jail or destitution or both. But he will have done his nation a great service if his sacrifice brings to an end this affront to accountable government.

One gets the feeling that, in the coming years, a good number of True Americans will end their days ‘in jail or destitution or both’.

We each have to ask ourselves if we are willing to make such a sacrifice — a sacrifice that in a more nobler age was worded thusly:

…we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

We can either do our Duty or join that long and pathetic list of those who betrayed the trust placed in them by The Founding Fathers — who acted as mere agents of our Creator — and who condemned their Posterity to needless suffering and misery.

A Loving and Merciful God bestowed on the people of The United States the natural rights to Life, to Liberty, and to Property.  He placed the maintenance of those rights in our hands, entrusted them to our care.  And, as Samuel Adams wrote in 1772:

Join-Or-Die-600x409If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave.

I know not what course others may take, but as for me: I will not be a slave; I will either Live Free Or Die.

OUTLAW.

Page 666: Making The End Of Days Fun

16 April 2014 @ 19:55

Page-666-200

SUPER DUPER MODEL IRINA SHAYK
MEETS WITH DEMOCRATIC SENATORS

Rule5News-Irina-Shayk-PageSix-001x

Full story here.

____________________________________

RAPPER CHRIST BEARER CUTS-OFF PENIS,
LEAPS OF BUILDING

Christ-Bearer-WithPenis-001x

Picture of Christ Bearer [real name: Andre Johnson] in happier daze
when he still had his ‘Johnson’.

And the poor, dumb bastard lived!

Full story here.

____________________________________

In Other News:

ED ASSNER, er, ASNER IS STILL ALIVE?

Full story here.

____________________________________

BLIND ITEM: What large-eared celebrity politician’s wife will be really upset if she learns her arranged marriage hubby has been spending more time in a Penn playing with his balls than on the golf course like he tells her?

Mad Men Spoiler: Harry Reid Is One

15 April 2014 @ 21:17

Harry-Reid-MadMan-001c

‘Well, it’s not over.

We can’t have an American people
that violate the law
and then just walk away from it.

So it’s not over.’

 

 

 

No, Harry, it’s not over

‘Boston Strong’? [Update: Boston Bombsquad On Scene At Finish Line]

15 April 2014 @ 19:55

As you probably know, today is the one year anniversary of the successful Jihadist bombing at the Boston Marathon.

As I live in New England that means that news out of Boston is reported throughout the region every day [please keep in mind that, even though Connecticut is located physically in this region, it is not part of it mentally, so it doesn't count here].

For the past year, we New Englanders have been treated to endless stories about the victims of the bombing and those who responded to it.  In fact, one TV station, WCVB, out of Boston has run a nightly feature called ‘Boston Strong‘ since a few days after the terrorist attack.

As I am sure you will not be surprised to learn, after the first month or so of coverage of the two Muslims who committed this heinous act, any mention of the terrorist nature of it or the fact that they were acting in the name of Jihad has barely been repeated.  As Mark Steyn wrote today:

…The post-marathon media coverage was near parodic in its willingness to seek refuge in even the most absurd alternatives for why the Tsarnaev brothers did what they did. And so what happened will happen again. Because, as my Happy Warrior column put it, “Jihad Abhors A Vacuum”.

The slogan on everyone’s lips here was and still is ‘Boston Strong’, but everyone seems to be wallowing in grief over the terrorist attack.  It’s unseemly for a supposed robust people to act this way, but, sadly, not surprising.

UPDATE at 1959…

From the Boston Police:

There’s an ongoing post here at Twitchy.

Fun! With Drudge Headlines

15 April 2014 @ 07:58

MAG: If nuke exploded in downtown DC, what should you do?

Die

PAPER: IS TRYING TO BE PERFECT MAKING YOU ILL?

See: Leftism, Mental Illness and

US AIRWAYS tweets graphic photo of nude woman to customers…

And the problem is??? Heck, I might actually fly with them again.

UPDATE: Fukushima Radiation Reaching West Coast…

It could only help at this point.

Papal envoy put to test in Venezuela talks…

Well, hey, you try taking a test when some foreigner is jabbering away at you in gibberish.

Russia Tests Multi-Warhead ICBM…

While Obama test multi-dimpled golf balls [they’re the only
balls he has].

RUSSIAN FIGHTER JET BUZZES NAVY WARSHIP…

Pentagon calls ‘unprofessional’…

No…it’s unprofessional when you don’t answer your phone calls

Police Testing ‘Live GOOGLE Earth’…

Hey, shouldn’t planet testing be left to the gang at NASA or the Federation?

Chinese Thunder God Herb Works as Well as Pain Therapy…

Call me skeptical, but when have you ever heard of a god named ‘Herb’? And how could he possibly compete with Vicodin or Oxy?

Pakistani held for cannibalism after eating baby…

Dog chosen for jury duty…

If these stories are related, this Paki is screwed.

China’s President Xi urges greater military use of space…

There’s certainly plenty of it to go around. As a money-saving measure, I would recommend they use Space Bags.

Details: Gov. Christie’s interview with investigators…

Talk about a waste of space, eh, my yellow brothahs!

POST OFFICE BULKS UP ON AMMO

Uh…why not carbs?

Mark Steyn On The #BundyRanch Incident

14 April 2014 @ 21:27

Two spot-on observations by one of our best Patriots [he's more of an American that all of the Left combined].

First:

…These are low-level bureaucrats from a minor branch of the vast bottomless alphabet soup of federal agencies, and they’re running around pretending to be elite commandos. The county sheriff is supposed to be “the law”. But he had to broker a deal to get the BLM out of there because in America every jumped-up pen-pusher from the Bureau of Compliance has his own branch of “the law”, a personal SWAT team to act as judge, jury, executioner and, if necessary, as in Nevada, as army of occupation. In most parts of the developed world, there is “the police”, and that’s it. If a bureaucrat from the Ministry of Paperwork wants to have you seized, he has to persuade a judge to issue a warrant and then let the local coppers handle it as they see fit. There is an obvious conflict of interest when every tinpot regulatory agency has its own enforcement arm, and it imputes to even legitimate cases the whiff of something malodorous and, indeed, despotic.

A ‘whiff’?  No longer.  The national government reeks of the stench of Tyranny.

Mr. Steyn again:

Jay Currie thinks the Nevada showdown reflects a shifting balance of power between the citizen and the state-media complex. He may be right. In the pre-smartphone era, I think the BLM snipers would have had few qualms about offing members of the Bundy family, anymore than their fellow bureaucratic enforcers at Ruby Ridge did about shooting Vicki Weaver in the head as she was cradling her baby and running for cover. Waco might have gone differently in the age of cellphone video.

This should give us all some hope.

And so should this:

Bundy-Ranch-Standoff-201404-byReuters-001

Good old American resolve and ingenuity in action — they surrounded the browncoated bastards!

O U T L A W

Bundy-Ranch-Standoff-201401-byRickWright-001x

The Left Has No Better Angels In Their Natures

14 April 2014 @ 20:31

The report is by The Washington Examiner and the commentary by Jeff Goldstein:

Federalism is dead.  Sure, it’s there in the Constitution, but since marriage (and just about every other “noble cause”) has been re-defined as a civil right, the entirety of the 10th amendment is now effectively and functionally moot. Washington Examiner:

A federal judge has ordered Ohio authorities to recognize the marriages of gay couples performed in other states.

Judge Timothy Black’s ruling on Monday criticized the state’s “ongoing arbitrary discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.”

Allow me to interject and add a partial list of other arbitrary discrimination involved with marriage laws:  age of consent; number of partners; blood relationship; species of partner; etc.  All ongoing.  All discriminatory.  None unconstitutional. Until now, when the door is opened to turning the institution of marriage, which doesn’t prevent coupling or cohabitation or prohibit relationships, into a civil right.

Judges like this, who play philosopher king rather than stick to the authority granted them under the Constitution, should be summarily recalled.   Period.  End of story.

I think we’re way past that, Jeff: as I see it, tarring and feathering is the new recall.

Please do take the time to click here and read the rest of Jeff’s post, which is very well done, per usual.

Knowing that there are enough True Americans out there who have reached their boiling points, I think it only a matter of time before we see more Cliven Bundys arising.

The big question, of course, is: how will the Despots in government react when they do?

I think I may have found the answer in a comment I just jotted down after reading the transcript of a lecture delivered recently by Patrick Deneen, where he said:

And this was exactly what early conservative thinkers recognized was the “end-game” of liberalism—it sought, to the greatest extent possible, the elimination of all constitutive ties to any mediating or civil institution, to be replaced by our direct relationship with the State. This would be accomplished not by means of enslaving the population, but by promising that this constituted the very essence of liberation. This was the basic insight of Tocqueville’s culminating chapters of Democracy in Americathat the democratic despotism of a mild “tutelary” state would come about not by force and terror, but by the willing acquiescence of an isolated and individuated citizenry. This was the argument of Bertrand de Jouvenel, who observed in his neglected masterpiece On Power that the rise of the centralized modern State was spurred when monarchs, seeking to break the power of local lords, promised liberation to the people in return for their direct fealty, and thus began a long and familiar tradition of expanding State power in the very name of liberation of individuals from mediating ties. His argument was refined and made with distinct power in the modern context by Robert Nisbet in the earliest years of American conservatism, in his 1953 book Quest for Community, in which he argued that the totalized State was not simply the imposition of despotic force upon a recalcitrant people—it was never that—but was desired by populations whose “longing for community” had been transferred from a range of identities and memberships below the level of the State, to the State itself.

We begin to see this with ever-growing clarity in our own times—a new, kinder and gentler total State. It promises its citizenry liberty at every turn, and that liberty involves ever-greater freedom from the partial institutions of civil society, or ones remade in accordance with the aims of the State. The states as sovereign political units have been almost wholly eviscerated, and are now largely administrative units for the federal government. Satisfied with that victory, we now see extraordinary efforts to “break” two institutions that have always been most resistant to the total State: churches and family. We see an unprecedented efforts by the Federal government to abridge religious liberty by conscripting religious institutions like Little Sisters of the Poor (and my institution, Notre Dame) to be agents conscripted into providing abortifacients, sterilization and contraception—in the name of individual liberty. We can expect determined and even ferocious efforts to bend Churches to accept gay marriage as a norm, even to the point of forcing them entirely out of the civil realm. And we see increasing efforts of the government to “liberate” children from their families—represented perhaps most chillingly by the MSNBC clip showing Melissa Harris-Perry explaining how the greatest obstacle to State education has been the pervasive notion that kids “belong” to families rather than belonging “collectively to all of us.”

Can the New Left — those demon children of the Progressive-Communist movements of the first half of the 20th Century — who are now in power and in control of the Left In America, resist the employing of force?  Unlike their predecessors, they are impatient and, more importantly, committed to remaining immature, which means they possess the child’s uncontrollable urge to strike out at their foes in wild tantrums.  So, I expect that they will lash out at us at some point, their spoiled-brat Narcissism getting the best of them.  Let us never forget, as well, that the Left has no better angels in their natures.

If I am correct, then we must be prepared to resist, to fight back.

We must be resolved that the Left will not win.

The time has come to saddle-up and be ready to ride.

OUTLAW

Chris Muir On The Red Storm Rising

13 April 2014 @ 21:13

For now, the stand-off at Cliven Bundy’s Ranch is over.

Chris Muir captures the feelings that this incident arose in the Souls of every True American:

Day-By-Day-ChrisMuir-20140413

Bravo, Chris, that was dead solid perfect [please do check out his daily Day By Day cartoons].

Wolverines-Logo-370

This situation with the Bundy Ranch is not over for either side – especially for the Tyrants.

Perhaps the denouement, when it does come, will be remembered as our Boston Massacre.

Resistentiam Tyrannis nunc.
Resistentiam Tyrannis saecula.
PROSCRIPTUS!

Resistance to Tyranny now.
Resistance to Tyranny forever.
OUTLAWS!

Message To Sarah Palin

13 April 2014 @ 20:07

Over at Breitbart, Tony Lee reports on Sarah Palin’s appearance on Saturday’s Fox News show Cashin’ In [tip of the fedora to Smitty][this is worth quoting in full* and emphasis mine]:

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin blasted President Barack Obama on Saturday for either not understanding or deliberately disrespecting the Constitution.

“We have a president who doesn’t understand or just chooses to disrespect our Constitution,” Palin said on Fox News’ Cashin In with host Eric Bolling.

Obama has unilaterally changed immigration, health care, and welfare laws, among others, according to Palin, and she said that he has sent a message with his actions that an elite crew will run the government as they see fit instead of “We the People.”

She also said there needs to be “new energy” in government instead of more blue bloods and when asked about her comments suggesting that Hillary Clinton run, Palin emphasized that she never said it would be a good thing if Hillary won.

When asked what Americans could do to ensure the Constitution is not assaulted, Palin said they should elect people who “promise to pay whatever price it is going to take to protect our Constitution” at the national level and support candidates who are not afraid to call for a convention of the states, if necessary, to be a check on an overreaching federal government.

Needless to say, I agree wholeheartedly with Mrs. Palin.

Message To Sarah Palin:

If you pledge to ‘pay whatever price it is going to take to protect our Constitution’ then it is your duty to run for the Presidency in 2016 because you are the best possible candidate.

You ‘get it’ the most out of all nationally prominent conservatives.

You have executive experience.

You are possessed of Common Sense.

You can articulate conservative beliefs better than anyone else in possible contention.

You are possessed of the same strength of character as Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, and Winston Churchill.

Don’t do as you did in 2011/2012 and refuse to pledge your life, your fortune, and your Sacred Honor in our cause.  While your reasons were understandable, the time has come for all True Americans to be willing to sacrifice all in the cause of restoring our Freedoms and Liberties.

If people like yourself do not do the right thing now, there will be much blood shed later.

Do your Duty, dammit.

Your Humble and Obedient Servant…
Robert Belvedere

 

_________________________________
* Especially so you don’t have to go to
Breitbart and be subjected to their annoying
auto-play videos.

Rule 5 Saturday

12 April 2014 @ 18:16

S A R A H   M c D O N A L D . . .

Sarah-McDonald-000

Read more…

The Left Airbrushes LBJ Back Into The Picture

12 April 2014 @ 14:54

As Stacy McCain points out:

There was once a sort of bipartisan consensus about this: Left-wingers hated LBJ for fighting the Vietnam war; right-wingers hated him because he wouldn’t fight to win in Vietnam….

For decades, the Left In America tried to convince everyone that LBJ was not one of their own, that he was a ‘morally bankrupt old fraud’ [which was a Big Lie kind of argument, considering that, to be a Leftist-in-good-standing, you have to reject all Morality].

While they would speak very approvingly of the Civil Rights and ‘Anti-Poverty’ laws passed during his tenure in Office, the Left would not give LBJ credit as the leader of those efforts.  For the former, they would say that he was carrying-out the wishes of JFK, prodded by Bobby’s efforts [let us not forget that they were the ones who first revealed the famous quote by LBJ — when the 'Anti-Poverty' laws were passed — that they have, until recently, repeated nearly ad nauseam: 'I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.']  For the latter, they would credit JFK, RFK, and others, like Hubert Humphrey [who got Rehabilitated by the Leftists a lot quicker, especially once he was dead and couldn't correct them].  If the Left gave LBJ any credit, it was for giving-in to the political and ‘moral’ pressure put on him by the Holy Priests Of The Leftist Order Of Illumination because he was the Ultimate Political Player.

For some reason, the Left In America now feels that it’s okay for them to Rehabilitate Lyndon Baines Johnson, witness:

President Barack Obama heralded the resolve of former President Lyndon B. Johnson in pushing through the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and brought up one of Johnson’s more famous lines to his presidential advisers.

“Most of his staff counseled him against it,” Obama said Thursday at the LBJ Presidential Library in Austin, Texas, referring to Johnson’s desire to push the civil rights bill. “They said it was hopeless, that it would anger powerful Southern Democrats, that it risked derailing the rest of his domestic agenda.”

Obama then recited Johnson’s notable rebuttal to cautious staffers: “’What the hell’s the presidency for?’ What the hell’s the presidency for if not to fight for causes you believe in?”

Interesting.  perhaps it’s just the Obama Regime that wants to Rehabilitate LBJ because, if you read that last sentence from ‘Obama’, it sounds like he’s trying to make the case for justifying his abuse of power, his pen-phone approach to Despotism.  Hmmm….I don’t know.

What I do know, however, is that it would be nice if one of the apparatchiks in the MSM would ask King Barack The Unready what he thought about his new hero’s statement: ‘I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years’.

Ain’t gonna happen, of course.

This demented Freak Show we’re living in will just continue on.

The Willed Ignorance Of ‘Barack Hussein Obama’*

12 April 2014 @ 00:03

In a very good analysis of the gross incompetence of the Administration’s foreign policy, Paco, at one point, remarks:

The truth, however, is that this unbroken string of failures belongs not so much to John Kerry as to Barack Obama, whose knowledge of, and interest in, foreign affairs seems to be on a par with his expertise in, say, pre-Columbian artifacts or the migratory patterns of the Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemastica). I cannot recollect a U.S. president so thoroughly incurious as to the doings of foreigners, nor as ignorant of their designs and stratagems. In a time of renewed Russian imperialism, mad mullahs in pursuit of nuclear weapons, and metastasizing terrorism throughout the Middle East and Africa, this level of obtuseness is not only embarrassing but positively dangerous – and not simply for America, but for the world.

The reason ‘Obama’ is so incurious is simple: he’s a Leftist.

Leftists believe that they have gained the Secret Knowledge of how the world works.  They are certain that they understand what motivates all people.  The Leftists are the Illuminated Ones who are destined to save Mankind from itself.  This is why they believe that they should rightfully be in charge of all aspects of Life.

In the sterile laboratories of their minds, located far, far away from Reality, these Coffee House Philosophers have devised a System Of The World that will, if implemented, bring about, they are so very, very sure, Heaven On Earth.

So, why should they ‘waste’ their time trying to understand what motivates the leaders and peoples of different nations and different colors?  The Left ‘knows’ all it needs to know. Besides, Immanentizing The Eschaton is hard work, so they have to spend all their precious time working towards that goal.

GoodFriendsDLFTTITE-254Thus, the grand and enduring incompetency of the Administration is not surprising and all.  Some of us predicted this back in 2008, but we were labeled ‘unhelpful’ and ‘hysterical’ and ‘extreme’ and ‘fundamentally unserious’ and the Establishment began it’s campaign to marginalize us…and they succeeded.

Well…we told you so and now the World is, as we said it would become, a much more dangerous place.  Storm clouds hang unmoving over The West and we are bereft of the shelter of the Pax Americana.  The forces of Totalitarianism are on the march — even within the borders of The United States.  [Some of our tormentors are now, finally, seeing the light, but, as Jeff Goldstein believes so do I believe: we will grow old waiting for any apologies.]

We are about to enter a true Dark Age.

________________________________________________
* ‘Barack Hussein Obama’ is a fictional character
created by David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett,
Bill Ayers, Barry Soetero, etc…

 

 

Hey, Conservatives: Cliven Bundy Is Not A Deadbeat Or A Whackjob

11 April 2014 @ 19:50

Dana Loesch cuts through all the Leftist propaganda and conservative ignorance.

By now you’re familiar with the standoff between the federal government, i.e. the Bureau of Land Management, and 67 year-old rancher Cliven Bundy. (If not, check the backstory and my radio interview with him here.) The BLM asserts their power through the expressed desire to protect the endangered desert tortoise, a tortoise so “endangered” that their population can no longer be contained by the refuge constructed for them so the government is closing it and euthanizing over a thousand tortoises. The tortoises, the excuse that BLM has given for violating claims to easements and running all but one lone rancher out of southern Nevada, is doing fine. In fact, the tortoise has lived in harmony with cattle in the Gold Butte, Clark County Nevada for over a hundred years, or as long as Cliven Bundy’s family has lived on the land as ranchers. In fact, the real threat to it is urbanization, not cattle.

A tortoise isn’t the reason why BLM is harassing a 67 year-old rancher. They want his land. The tortoise wasn’t of concern when Harry Reid worked BLM to literally change the boundaries of the tortoise’s habitat to accommodate the development of his top donor, Harvey Whittemore. Whittemore was convicted of illegal campaign contributions to Senator Reid. Reid’s former senior adviser is now the head of BLM. Reid is accused of using the new BLM chief as a puppet to control Nevada land (already over 84% of which is owned by the federal government) and pay back special interests. BLM has proven that they’ve a situational concern for the desert tortoise as they’ve had no problem waiving their rules concerning wind or solar power development. Clearly these developments have vastly affected a tortoise habitat more than a century-old, quasi-homesteading grazing area. If only Clive Bundy were a big Reid donor.

BLM has also tried to argue that the rules have changed, long after Bundy claims he secured rights and paid his dues to Clark County, Nevada. BLM says they supersede whatever agreement Bundy had prior; they demanded that he reduce his living, his thousand-some-odd head of cattle down to a tiny herd of 150. It’s easy for the government to grant itself powers of overreach, but it doesn’t make it right. Many bad things are done in the name of unjust laws. Just look at Obamacare. This heavy-handed tactic has run the other ranchers from the area and now Bundy is the last one. He’s the last one because he stood up to the federal government.

So why does BLM want to run Bundy off this land and is Reid connected?

I discussed this on “Kelly File” tonight, video via Jim Hoft.

- See more at: http://danaloeschradio.com/the-real-story-of-the-bundy-ranch/#sthash.jrh8COME.dpuf

By now you’re familiar with the standoff between the federal government, i.e. the Bureau of Land Management, and 67 year-old rancher Cliven Bundy. (If not, check the backstory and my radio interview with him here.) The BLM asserts their power through the expressed desire to protect the endangered desert tortoise, a tortoise so “endangered” that their population can no longer be contained by the refuge constructed for them so the government is closing it and euthanizing over a thousand tortoises. The tortoises, the excuse that BLM has given for violating claims to easements and running all but one lone rancher out of southern Nevada, is doing fine. In fact, the tortoise has lived in harmony with cattle in the Gold Butte, Clark County Nevada for over a hundred years, or as long as Cliven Bundy’s family has lived on the land as ranchers. In fact, the real threat to it is urbanization, not cattle.

A tortoise isn’t the reason why BLM is harassing a 67 year-old rancher. They want his land. The tortoise wasn’t of concern when Harry Reid worked BLM to literally change the boundaries of the tortoise’s habitat to accommodate the development of his top donor, Harvey Whittemore. Whittemore was convicted of illegal campaign contributions to Senator Reid. Reid’s former senior adviser is now the head of BLM. Reid is accused of using the new BLM chief as a puppet to control Nevada land (already over 84% of which is owned by the federal government) and pay back special interests. BLM has proven that they’ve a situational concern for the desert tortoise as they’ve had no problem waiving their rules concerning wind or solar power development. Clearly these developments have vastly affected a tortoise habitat more than a century-old, quasi-homesteading grazing area. If only Clive Bundy were a big Reid donor.

BLM has also tried to argue that the rules have changed, long after Bundy claims he secured rights and paid his dues to Clark County, Nevada. BLM says they supersede whatever agreement Bundy had prior; they demanded that he reduce his living, his thousand-some-odd head of cattle down to a tiny herd of 150. It’s easy for the government to grant itself powers of overreach, but it doesn’t make it right. Many bad things are done in the name of unjust laws. Just look at Obamacare. This heavy-handed tactic has run the other ranchers from the area and now Bundy is the last one. He’s the last one because he stood up to the federal government.

So why does BLM want to run Bundy off this land and is Reid connected?

I discussed this on “Kelly File” tonight, video via Jim Hoft.

- See more at: http://danaloeschradio.com/the-real-story-of-the-bundy-ranch/#sthash.jrh8COME.dpuf

I quote her in full to help spread the Truth:

By now you’re familiar with the standoff between the federal government, i.e. the Bureau of Land Management, and 67 year-old rancher Cliven Bundy. (If not, check the backstory and my radio interview with him here.) The BLM asserts their power through the expressed desire to protect the endangered desert tortoise, a tortoise so “endangered” that their population can no longer be contained by the refuge constructed for them so the government is closing it and euthanizing over a thousand tortoises. The tortoises, the excuse that BLM has given for violating claims to easements and running all but one lone rancher out of southern Nevada, is doing fine. In fact, the tortoise has lived in harmony with cattle in the Gold Butte, Clark County Nevada for over a hundred years, or as long as Cliven Bundy’s family has lived on the land as ranchers. In fact, the real threat to it is urbanization, not cattle.

A tortoise isn’t the reason why BLM is harassing a 67 year-old rancher. They want his land. The tortoise wasn’t of concern when Harry Reid worked BLM to literally change the boundaries of the tortoise’s habitat to accommodate the development of his top donor, Harvey Whittemore. Whittemore was convicted of illegal campaign contributions to Senator Reid. Reid’s former senior adviser is now the head of BLM. Reid is accused of using the new BLM chief as a puppet to control Nevada land (already over 84% of which is owned by the federal government) and pay back special interests. BLM has proven that they’ve a situational concern for the desert tortoise as they’ve had no problem waiving their rules concerning wind or solar power development. Clearly these developments have vastly affected a tortoise habitat more than a century-old, quasi-homesteading grazing area. If only Clive Bundy were a big Reid donor.

BLM has also tried to argue that the rules have changed, long after Bundy claims he secured rights and paid his dues to Clark County, Nevada. BLM says they supersede whatever agreement Bundy had prior; they demanded that he reduce his living, his thousand-some-odd head of cattle down to a tiny herd of 150. It’s easy for the government to grant itself powers of overreach, but it doesn’t make it right. Many bad things are done in the name of unjust laws. Just look at Obamacare. This heavy-handed tactic has run the other ranchers from the area and now Bundy is the last one. He’s the last one because he stood up to the federal government.

So why does BLM want to run Bundy off this land and is Reid connected?

I discussed this on “Kelly File” tonight, video via Jim Hoft.

*UPDATE: Those who say Bundy is a “deadbeat” are making inaccurate claims. Bundy has in fact paid fees to Clark County, Nevada in an arrangement pre-dating the BLM. The BLM arrived much later, changed the details of the setup without consulting with Bundy — or any other rancher — and then began systematically driving out cattle and ranchers. Bundy refused to pay BLM, especially after they demanded he reduce his heard’s head count down to a level that would not sustain his ranch. Bundy OWNS the water and forage rights to this land. He paid for these rights. He built fences, established water ways, and constructed roads with his own money, with the approval of Nevada and BLM. When BLM started using his fees to run him off the land and harassing him, he ceased paying. So should BLM reimburse him for managing the land and for the confiscation of his water and forage rights?

Cliven Bundy’s problem isn’t that he didn’t pay — he did — or that his cattle bother tortoises — they don’t — it’s that he’s not a Reid donor.

**One last thought: For those conservatives saying that since BLM arrived in the late 90s, it’s the law now, well, so is Obamacare.

So why does BLM want to run Bundy off this land and is Reid connected?

I discussed this on “Kelly File” tonight, video via Jim Hoft.

- See more at: http://danaloeschradio.com/the-real-story-of-the-bundy-ranch/#sthash.jrh8COME.dpuf

By now you’re familiar with the standoff between the federal government, i.e. the Bureau of Land Management, and 67 year-old rancher Cliven Bundy. (If not, check the backstory and my radio interview with him here.) The BLM asserts their power through the expressed desire to protect the endangered desert tortoise, a tortoise so “endangered” that their population can no longer be contained by the refuge constructed for them so the government is closing it and euthanizing over a thousand tortoises. The tortoises, the excuse that BLM has given for violating claims to easements and running all but one lone rancher out of southern Nevada, is doing fine. In fact, the tortoise has lived in harmony with cattle in the Gold Butte, Clark County Nevada for over a hundred years, or as long as Cliven Bundy’s family has lived on the land as ranchers. In fact, the real threat to it is urbanization, not cattle.

A tortoise isn’t the reason why BLM is harassing a 67 year-old rancher. They want his land. The tortoise wasn’t of concern when Harry Reid worked BLM to literally change the boundaries of the tortoise’s habitat to accommodate the development of his top donor, Harvey Whittemore. Whittemore was convicted of illegal campaign contributions to Senator Reid. Reid’s former senior adviser is now the head of BLM. Reid is accused of using the new BLM chief as a puppet to control Nevada land (already over 84% of which is owned by the federal government) and pay back special interests. BLM has proven that they’ve a situational concern for the desert tortoise as they’ve had no problem waiving their rules concerning wind or solar power development. Clearly these developments have vastly affected a tortoise habitat more than a century-old, quasi-homesteading grazing area. If only Clive Bundy were a big Reid donor.

BLM has also tried to argue that the rules have changed, long after Bundy claims he secured rights and paid his dues to Clark County, Nevada. BLM says they supersede whatever agreement Bundy had prior; they demanded that he reduce his living, his thousand-some-odd head of cattle down to a tiny herd of 150. It’s easy for the government to grant itself powers of overreach, but it doesn’t make it right. Many bad things are done in the name of unjust laws. Just look at Obamacare. This heavy-handed tactic has run the other ranchers from the area and now Bundy is the last one. He’s the last one because he stood up to the federal government.

So why does BLM want to run Bundy off this land and is Reid connected?

I discussed this on “Kelly File” tonight, video via Jim Hoft.

- See more at: http://danaloeschradio.com/the-real-story-of-the-bundy-ranch/#sthash.jrh8COME.dpuf

He is, in Truth, a brave man standing-up to Tyranny.

He is an OUTLAW — one of us.

He’s fighting for all of us who believe in The Constitution, who seek the restoration of the freedom and liberties bequeathed to us by God and The Founding Fathers.

We should all support him and do what we can to counter the lies being spread about him and to overcome the ignorance of our fellow conservatives.

LiveFreeOrDieResistentiam Tyrannis nunc.
Resistentiam Tyrannis saecula.
PROSCRIPTUS!

Resistance to Tyranny now.
Resistance to Tyranny forever.
OUTLAWS!

Hank Aaron Endorses Helter Skelter

11 April 2014 @ 08:22

I was going to offer some commentary on the sad and pitiable man known as Hank Aaron, but Mark Levin’s and, especially, Jeff Goldstein’s have really beaten me to the punches.

In case you missed what the former baseball star said, here’s an except from a report by Cheryl Chumley, over at The Washington Times [tip of the fedora to Mr. Levin]:

“We can talk about baseball. Talk about politics. Sure this country has a black president, but when you look at a black president, President Obama is left with his foot stuck in the mud from all of the Republicans with the way he’s treated,” Mr. Aaron told USA Today.

He went on, expressing both the good and bad of where race relations in the United States now stand: “We have moved in the right direction, and there have been improvements, but we still have a long ways to go in the country.

“The bigger difference is that back then they had hoods. Now they have neckties and starched shirts,” he said.

Goddamn sad because for many of his fans this will be his epitaph.

The Right Scoop has the audio of Mark Levin’s spot-on comments on what the fool said, but here is a highlight, as transcribed by Scoop:

I reject this race hustling. I reject this balkanization of this great nation. To say what he said about basically Republicans who are trying to stop Obama from destroying the economy, from turning our constitutional system on its head, is outrageous! I don’t care how many damn home runs he hit and I don’t care what his name is!

Jeff Goldstein is dead solid perfect:

… I didn’t comment yesterday on his remarks because frankly I was too disgusted; after all, here’s a man who was in pursuit of Babe Ruth’s home run record when I was a small child, and who played the majority of his career in a decade wherein Republicans marched with blacks and civil rights leaders against the Klan, against the segregationists, and against the Democratic politicians who worked to block Civil Rights legislation. I remember writing a book report on him in second grade, and I still remember his home run, which I watched live on TV, off of Al Downing, that broke Ruth’s record. Later, when I was in high school, I commemorated the moment in a large drawing that made the rounds at local art shows. Like many others, I understood, at least intellectually, the pressure Aaron was under during those days, just as I understand that a remainder of racists from all parts of the country harassed and threatened him. Which is why I, like many others of my generation, spent our youths pulling for him, idolizing him, inspired by his ability to overcome such adversity and continue on, the very model of consistency.

For him, years later, to call those from the party of Lincoln, which was formed in part as an abolitionist party, the modern-day Klan in neckties and starched shirts, is to do a disservice not only to those people who have always stood for individualism and a color-blind society, but to those who sacrificed so much taking the fight to an entrenched group of racists in many of the states. To suggest that those of us who fight daily to maintain individual dignity and autonomy are really just racists for vehemently disagreeing with the policies of a red-diaper baby, whose confidants include a collection of sixties radicals, domestic terrorists, and foreign provocateurs who hate this country, is absurd on its face, and really shouldn’t even be dignified with this response.

Not only that, but such historical revisionism shows how deeply stupid and, yes, enslaved, Aaron is — not to his color, but to the Democrat Party, for whom he’ll be used as a mouthpiece and a mascot of sorts. In fact, his brother-in-law happens to be (surprise!) a leftist Democrat Congressman.

LBJ, in touting his Great Society Program, famously said, ““I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.”

Henry Aaron, a man I once looked up to and a man who never came out in defense of people like Clarence Thomas, eg., is now playing the role of Samuel L Jackson in Django Unchained. He’s the kind of modern-day plantation slave LBJ envisioned, albeit one of those who gets the special privilege of living in the Big White House and speaking candidly, on occasion, to Master.

And in doing so, he may win over a bunch of Democrat and progressive hacks and get a medal of freedom or some such from the odious, race-baiting Obama, who can’t wait to rub shoulders with notorious race-hustler Al Sharpton; but he has forever tarnished his legacy, and he has essentially accused nearly half of all Americans — those whose party freed the slaves and fought for Civil Rights — of being like the bigoted Democrats they fought so hard against four decades ago.

Congrats, Henry. The Ghost of LBJ and Robert Byrd (and his Kleagle hood) would like to thank you for being a good boy and knowing your place. You’ll be rewarded with a pat on the head and some extra vittles come supper time.

There’s nothing left for me to say after what these two truly brilliant men have said, except to add: well, ‘Obama’ and Jarrett and Axelrod and all of your apparatchiks, you’ve made great progress in fundamentally transforming America into the Balkans.

In his dank and filthy prison cell, Charles Manson is laughing.

Brandeis Redefines What’s Kosher

10 April 2014 @ 20:25

And, apparently, it doesn’t include a magnificently brave woman who is fighting back against the cult religion that justified her genitals being mutilated and her body being savagely beaten.

One of my Friends In The Ether, Anthony Bialy speculates on what motivated the University’s President Frederick Lawrence:

Mark Steyn agrees with him:

As for Brandeis president Frederick Lawrence and the others who took this decision, nobody’s asking them to be as brave as Ayaan Hirsi Ali. They will never know what it’s like to have their associates murdered and to be forced into living under armed guard. They will never have to “share the risk” that Ms Hirsi Ali faces every day of her life. All that was required of President Lawrence & Co was that they not be total craven, jelly-spined squishes who fold like a cheap Bedouin tent at the first hint of pressure.

But Lawrence couldn’t even do that. Ayaan Hirsi Ali campaigns against female genital mutilation – that’s to say, the barbarous practice by which Muslim men deny women sexual pleasure by having their clitorises cut off. Lawrence and the other fellows who run Brandeis are in no danger of any equivalent procedure since it seems clear they’ve nothing down there to chop off anyway. The eunuchs of the American academy are the beneficiaries of western liberty, of the spirit of openness and inquiry that is the principal difference between us and the intellectually stagnant Muslim world. But they will not lift a finger to defend that tradition.

So getting an honorary degree at Brandeis, like serving on the board at Mozilla, is open only to those who make sure they never cross the Conformity Enforcers. And apostates to Islam, as Ayaan is regarded, must accept that they are apostates to American campus conformity, too, and be prepared to lead a life without the consolations of honorary degrees. Accepting the loss of A-list commencement gigs doesn’t take a lot of courage, but it still takes more than Frederick Lawrence has displayed….

What a pathetic little wretch of a Human Being this Post-American University President is.

And, considering the Anti-Semites who have received honorary degrees from Brandeis, it seems he’s also a Self-Hating Jew.

They say a man’s soul is reflected in his face…

Freddy 'No Balls' Lawrence

Freddy ‘No Balls’ Lawrence

…yup.

I’d like to wipe that smile off his smug face.

Frankly, We’re Tired Of Being Demonized…

09 April 2014 @ 22:14

In his latest column for The American Spectator, Ross Kaminsky attempts to defend his belief that majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts in the McCutcheon v. FEC was a ‘partial redemption’ for the Justice after his majority opinion in the Obamacare case, which he described as ‘nothing short of a disaster for the nation, and a huge black mark on John Roberts’ legacy.  Mr. Kaminsky spends a good deal of time arguing that we conservatives who are still angry with Roberts and believe he can never be redeemed in his present position are too rigid and that our demands for ‘purity’ are very counter-productive.

An example:

John Roberts’ Obamacare error was larger and vastly more consequential than any error of an average politician or candidate. But the insistence of Republicans, and particularly the most conservative (and often most active and vocal) members of the party base, on philosophical perfection, on having no measurable affiliation with “the establishment,” and on never ever compromising (ever!) has a lot to do with why we are still suffering under a president named Obama and particularly under a Senate Majority Leader named Reid.

Ah!  Mr. Kominsky has decided to seek shelter in the last refuge of a those who don’t get it, who refuse to grasp the grave danger The American Republic is in: blame the TEA Party.  He damns those of us who are holding our fellow conservatives to the standard set by The Founding Fathers and who support conservatives with backbone.  He condemns us for our work to get non-professional candidates elected:

I will not rehash all the stories, but just suggest a few names: Todd Akin, Richard Mourdock, Ken Buck (whom I like and who I hope wins his race for Congress this year), Christine “I’m not a witchO’Donnell, and Sharron Angle (a very nice woman who was not ready for the big time in a race where the GOP had a rare chance to repeat John Thune’s incredible take-down of Tom Daschle).

How dare we demand that our candidates be Constitutionalists?  Who the Hell do we think we are?!?

Karl Rove called, Ross, and he’d like to hear more of your advice.

I think I can speak for many when I say, Mr. Kaminsky: Frankly, we’re tired of being demonized and sick of being blamed for election losses that were caused by the Establishment GOP and Elite Conservative Leadership that did everything in their power to see that our candidates were mocked mercilessly and the subject of relentless calumnies thrown at them by the Left and by the Professional Right.

You and your kind scorn us and call us purists, which would be quite laughable if the stakes weren’t so high.  Our actions and opinions and demands are inline with those of The Founders — read their writings and speeches.

While Mr. Kaminsky is filled with condensation for we conservatives, he is brimming with modern, New-Agey sympathy for the put-upon Human Being that is John Roberts:

Some suggest that the left’s massive media campaign in support of Obamacare, particularly making it sound as if a Court decision striking it down would be fundamentally undemocratic (as if that were the point of the Constitution), had an impact on Chief Justice Roberts. CBS News reported that “Roberts pays attention to media coverage” and that “there were countless news articles in May warning of damage to the court — and to Roberts’ reputation — if the court were to strike down the mandate.”

If true that John Roberts does indeed care about public opinion, which is to say if he is a human being with at least a hint of normal behavior patterns for the species — such as liking, even if not explicitly seeking, appreciation for a task well done — then it is a particularly bad idea for conservatives to refuse to give Roberts an “Attaboy” for doing something that advances liberty and turns the nation a fraction of the way back toward the Constitution.

Couldn’t even the most principled fighter for a cause have marginally less motivation, perhaps an occasional moment of “Why am I doing this?” if his “allies” won’t acknowledge his efforts and his successes? When that fighter has one of the most powerful positions in any government on the planet, those allies need to rethink a few things.

Are you serious. RK: an ‘Attaboy’ for requiring that Roberts do his job?  That he not violate his Oath Of Office?  What you are suggesting is that he is a weak man who lacks the strength of character to be a Judge.  With friends like you….

The national government was set-up so that the Justices of the Supreme Court should make decisions without any consideration of public opinion, that the Senators represent the interests of the state governments, that the President be guided by the interests of the nation as a whole [following the advice of Edmund Burke: 'Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion'], and that only the members of the House Of Representatives consider the concerns of the moment of the citizens of The United States [and even then, they, too, are expected to believe as Mr. Burke did].

In the Comments section of Mr. Kaminsky’s post, 22 writes:

However, the fact remains that NFIB v. Sebelius will probably be the most important ruling to come from the Roberts Court and it was shockingly bad. None of the other justices agreed with his legal reasoning. He appears to have changed his position at the last minute after already written the “dissent” which was originally to serve as the majority opinion. He has been viewed as having “rewritten” the legislation so that it could pass his standard of legality and while he claims there are limits to the Interstate Commerce Clause, he greatly expanded the government’s power to tax, in the face of the administration’s claim that the “mandate fee” is a fee except when it is a tax (hard to follow that logic). Chief Justice Roberts is seen as having buckled under political pressure and when judges do that, their credibility is lost. I wish it didn’t happen, but it did. The ruling is a disaster. I don’t see how Mr. Roberts can escape being forever linked with it, particularly with those us who view ObamaCare as clearly unconstitutional and a great violation of our fundamental rights. I agree with you Ross, that we should refrain from further bashing him, but my confidence in the justice has been badly shaken.

I come not to bash Roberts, but to point out that, by his actions in the Obamacare case, he betrayed The Constitution, he violated his Oath Of Office, and he showed that he is man with an appalling weakness of character.

John Roberts can write opinions from now until Kingdom Come that meet our standards, but his grave mistake, his moment of pathetic weakness, his cowardice, his monumental betrayal in putting the Court’s stamp-of-approval on the fundamental transformation of the relationship between the individual and the state, where the state gained Power And Control over the bodies of all American citizens, is so awful in it’s implications, so heinous in it’s ramifications, so deadly in it’s implementation that this one opinion will be his only epitaph — that is, if Justice and Truth still exist in the future.

Of Course…

08 April 2014 @ 21:09

The U.S. will keep its current force of 450 land-based nuclear missiles but remove 50 from their launch silos as part of a plan to bring the U.S. into compliance with a 2011 U.S.-Russia arms control treaty, the Pentagon said Tuesday.

The resulting launch-ready total of 400 Minuteman 3 intercontinental ballistic missiles would be the lowest deployed ICBM total since the early 1960s.

That was from the AP, Robert Burns reporting [tip of the fedora to Drudge].

While Russian troops are on the move in Ukraine gobbling-up territory at will with the help of Fifth Columnist thugs, ‘Barack Hussein Obama’ takes steps to further weaken the only nation that could stand-up to our Russian enemy.

As that was happening, his Dullard Of State was once again defaming our ally Israel:

US Secretary of State John Kerry said Tuesday that both Israelis and Palestinians were responsible for the current crisis in peace talks, but appeared to allocate the lion’s share of the blame to Jerusalem.

And as we learned about the above actions, we heard the following about one of Barry’s closest allies, as related brilliantly by Jeff Goldstein:

…it turns out that while Sharpton was perfecting his race-hustling street thug bombast, he was also in bed with some pretty shady customers — the New York Mafia crime families, to be more exact — and that, caught up in a drug sting…he naturally did what people like him do: he turned state’s evidence and became an FBI snitch (a position for which, now that it has come glaringly to light, Sharpton believes he should be praised for, claiming that as a budding, race-hustling street thug, he actually went to the FBI on his own and volunteered his services to help take down a Mafia crime boss.  Which, given Sharpton’s history of embracing law enforcement and acting in the interest of the Greater Good rather than on his own behalf, is entirely plausible.   If you happen to be of the type who would follow or embrace a race-hustling street thug-turned-race-hustling street thug with political influence, a record of tax evasion, a history of White House visits, and his own show on MSNBC.

Which, it turns out, must include the likes of our very own President and Attorney General, both of whom have given support to Sharpton’s organizations — with Obama slated to keynote yet another Sharpton “convention” (read: fundraiser), the proceeds from which never go to the Reverend Al, but rather are used for the social good that comes from overt leftism, with its confiscatory taxes, its reliance on an enslaved client welfare state, and its tactic of leveling consistently phony charges of racism against anyone who disagrees with progressive policies, which in turn makes “diversity” so appealing to so many!

Just another day in Obamaica.

God, how I hate the 21st Century.

General-Patton-x

Big Mouths At Dartmouth

08 April 2014 @ 20:43

Leftist students at Dartmouth recently issued the Administration a set of demands.  Not being satisfied with the response these Radicals got from the gutless milquetoasts who run the college, they staged a sit-in.

Stacy McCain has excerpts from their demands and offers his spot-on analysis of these Socialist Special Snowflakes in a post over at his joint entitled: ‘Diversity’ Debacle At Dartmouth: ‘Transformative Justice,’ Really?

A highlight from a report on the sit-in:

As students filed in to Hanlon’s outer office around 4 p.m., they were greeted by administrative assistants, who noted that they had been expecting them. Dean of the College Charlotte Johnson then told the students that she and Hanlon would be available to talk in a few minutes.

When Johnson asked why the group was there, Dondei Dean ’17 spoke first.

“We’re here to see President Hanlon. You probably know most of us already, but, just to sum up, we are extremely dissatisfied with the response that he issued,” Dean said. “It was not on our terms. We are here to see him and demand a point-by-point response, and we are not going to leave until we get one.”

Approximately 10 minutes later, the entire group was invited into Hanlon’s office. Dean, acting as primary spokesperson, told the president that the students were “deeply enraged” by Hanlon’s response to the “Freedom Budget,” stating dissatisfaction with both the length of the administration’s press release, which they said encompassed only three points, and their choice not to respond through The Dartmouth.

Here we have students who are attending one of the most elite colleges in the country.  Who, despite claiming that they suffered ‘economic oppression at the hands of rich, white power structures’ and have been subjected to ‘racism, classism, sexism, heterosexism, and ableism’ that ‘are deployed at Dartmouth and beyond as forms of institutional violence’, somehow were among the ten percent [out of the 20,000 people who apply each year to attend Dartmouth] accepted for admittance.

Not only do these ungrateful little shits rail against the people who run Dartmouth, they claim their charges apply to all of America — most especially the White Men [cue dastardly music].

As TOM commentator Phil_McG remarks:

Just a few of the things the white man has given the world:

Electricity
Cars
Computers
Vaccines
Air conditioning
The internet
Phones
Radio
Space travel
Universities
Planes
Democracy
Cinema
Antibiotics
Trains
The printing press
Guns
Bicycles
Pencils
Modern agriculture
The United States of America

White men are, on the whole, full of awesome and win. That should go without saying, except that these days apparently it does need saying.

You’re welcome, world.

‘Yeah…but what have the Romans ever done for us?!?!?!?’

‘White Patriarchal Splitter!’

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,836 other followers